LEASE
COMMITTEE UNAPPROVED
SPECIAL
MEETING MINUTES
NOVEMBER
16, 2009
Session
09-08 a Regular Meeting of the Lease Committee was called to order on November
16, 2009 at 3:00 pm by Chair Shelly Erickson at the Homer City Hall Cowles
Council Chambers located at 491 E. Pioneer Avenue, Homer,
PRESENT:
SHELLY ERICKSON, ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION
PHILIP ALDERFER, PUBLIC
AT LARGE
BRYAN HAWKINS,
RICK ABBOUD,
JOHN VELSKO,
REGINA HARVILLE, FINANCE
DIRECTOR
STAFF:
PORT & HARBOR
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR MARTIN
DEPUTY
Approval of the Agenda
Chair Erickson requested the agenda be amended to move Item B under New
Business to Item A.
The amended agenda was approved by consensus of the committee.
Public Comments Regarding Items on the Agenda
There were no comments.
RECONSIDERATION
None.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
None.
VISITORS
None.
STAFF & COUNCIL REPORT/COMMITTEE REPORTS/BOROUGH REPORTS
None.
PUBLIC HEARING
None.
Pending Business
A. El Pescador Sublease Request
1. Review
and discussion on proposed response to El Pescador request for Subleases.
Chair Erickson
requested a motion to discuss.
VELSKO/ ABBOUD -
MOVED TO DISCUSS.
There was no
discussion.
VOTE. YES.
NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Mr. Bryan Hawkins stated
he drafted a letter but in review of the minutes there were some mixed
messages, so he would like the Committee to review and add comments or changes
as desired.
Discussion on the
enclosed draft of the letter composed by Mr. Hawkins ensued. Chair Erickson
asked if there were any points he was uneasy about. He stated there were none
and noted the two issues as stated in the draft letter, the setback
requirements and building limited to 30%. The Committee was in consensus that
this not languish.
The building needed
to be removed however concerns were expressed that a perceived planning and
zoning question was addressed in the letter from the Harbormaster.
Mr. Abboud explained
that this is the quagmire they face with a number of things that go on and
pointed out this was a violation of the lease, and maybe the word variance
should not be used and recommended an alternative statement. He went to state
that since overbuilding the 30% was not prohibited, but a permit was needed. He
noted there was a process for approval and it was up to the lessee to apply for
a permit, however he was hesitant in approving something that violated code. Mr.
Abboud explained that this business has been in violation since the beginning
and it harbors ill feelings by those who are in compliance.
Mr. Velsko noted
receiving inquiries about allowing another similar business in the same
situation. He stated he responds to those questions that the Lease Committee
does not perform enforcement.
Mr. Abboud commented
that a good response would be the Committee is not addressing that situation at
this time.
Further discussion ensued
on recommending zero lot lines and the setbacks be addressed in the Spit
Comprehensive Plan. It was noted that it would be a good idea to include it and
when a draft plan is available for review, this committee should definitely be
included on the review commentary. This currently is not the proper time to
address or comment as there is an issue on the floor.
It was suggested to
change the word “variance” to “permit”; it is possible to get a permit for this
structure, discussion on permit for structure or exemption from a rule. Revised
recommended wording was offered.
Ms. Harville read
the revised recommended paragraph, “Another obstacle is that HCC 21.28.040(d)
states that Tenant may not build on more than 30% of their lot. Your lot
currently is at the maximum allowed under this rule without any sublease
buildings. It is possible to get a Conditional Use Permit, through the City’s
Planning Department allowing more than 30% use, and then voted on by the Homer City
Council. The Lease Committee cannot recommend you apply for a CUP due to the setback
issue. Please contact the planning Department if you have any questions.
Mr. Alderfer went on
record stating that he appreciates it is not the Committees position to
encourage or discourage, however he felt it important to give someone full and
complete information and if they know an application is going to be denied then
it would be fair to the business owner to let them know.
There was a brief discussion
on whether the Committee was offering false hope to the business owner.
There were no
further recommended changes to the draft letter.
VOTE. YES.
NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
NEW BusinesS
Chair Erickson turned the gavel to Vice Chair Alderfer and stepped down
from the dais as she was previously found to have a conflict of interest on the
next topic for discussion.
A. Home Run Oil Lease Proposal for Tank
Farm
Vice
Chair Alderfer requested Mr. Hawkins to update the Committee.
Mr.
Hawkins stated that after the last meeting questions were submitted from Home
Run Oil. The Port and Harbor Advisory Commission reviewed this issue. The
Commission did not fully support using Lot 13 but recommended using Lot 8D1 and
if Lot 8D1 was not feasible for the proposed use then only recommended using
the western portion of Lot 13. Clarification on what the western portion of Lot
13 was given by Mr. Hawkins using the aerial map of the spit; Mr. Abboud asked
if a recent master plan or analysis was conducted on what would be needed to
support activities related to the Deep Water Dock (DWD) expansion and what
actually is the proposed plan for the DWD Expansion. Mr. Hawkins pointed out
what Phase I, 2 and 3 of the DWD would entail. Mr. Abboud still had difficulty
is processing a decision when he did not know the other side of the coin. He
further asked what plans were made or talked about regarding support on the
uplands.
Mr.
Velsko stated that was a major concern of the Port & Harbor Commission to
keep it for staging.
Ms.
Harville asked if there would be enough room on Lot 8D1 for the proposed Tank
Farm.
The
Committee requested response from Mr. Erickson. Mr. Erickson responded the
physical attributes of Lot 8D1 and some hindrances dealing with that lot.
Mr.
Alderfer felt the Port & Harbor recommendation was either or situation. Mr.
Velsko explained that they felt it was important to have the project proceed
and that was why they recommended the western portion. He further added that
the one causeway was so far in the future.
HAWKINS/ALDERFER
- MOVED THAT IN RESPONSE OF HOME RUN OIL TO THE LEASE COMMITTEE FOR A LONG TERM
LEASE OF A PORTION OF LOT 13 (HOMER Spit #5)
on the Homer Spit in order to construct A TANK FARM, FUEL DISTRIBUTION
HUB AND PIPELINE TERMINUS, THE LEASE COMMITTEE DENIES THIS REQUEST DUE TO THE
CRITICAL NEED OF THIS PROPERTY AS SUPPORT FOR THE DEEP WATER DOCK PRESENT AND
FUTURE CORE OPERATIONS, AS STATED IN THE CITY OF HOMER’S LAND USE PLAN.
Mr.
Hawkins explained that he did not believe Lot 13 was the best place for a tank
farm. This would be the 3rd tank farm on the spit and it may get
more support if they were all kept together. He further stated that the
adjacent land is critical to the operations of the DWD. What revenue is
generated is quite substantial. Mr. Velsko re-stated that the intention of the
PH Commission and did not know if he could vote in favor of this motion. Mr.
Abboud asked if the Lease Committee could trump future land designation. Mr.
Hawkins stated that they could only make the recommendations to council to re-designate
the use of Lot 13 if the committee approved the use from the applicant. The
audio was intermittent due to interference from fax machine. Mr. Velsko stated
he would have to vote against the motion due to the wishes of the Port &
Harbor Commission which he represents those interests.
VOTE.
YES. HARVILLE, ALDERFER, HAWKINS, ABBOUD.
VOTE.
NO. VELSKO.
Motion
carried.
HAWKINS/VELSKO
- THE LEASE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT THE HOMER CITY COUNCIL OFFER A REQUEST
FOR PROPOSAL FOR LOT 8D1, HOMER SPIT #6, AS A PREFERRED LOCATION IN RESPONSE TO
THE REQUEST FROM HOME RUN OIL FOR A LONG TERM LEASE ON THE SPIT FOR A TANK
FARM, FUEL DISTRIBUTION HUB AND PIPELINE TERMINUS FROM THE CITY OF HOMER’S DEEP
WATER DOCK.
Mr.
Hawkins felt this was the best use and location for the proposed new tank farm.
He additionally noted that Home Run Oil wanted the distribution hub and
pipeline terminus included in the language of the lease. It was discussed if
specific language was needed to address access to the DWD in the proposal
request; if easements would be required; additional concerns by Coastal
Management, etc.
VOTE.
YES. NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion
carried.
The
committee next addressed questions submitted by Home Run Oil in October. There
was a brief discussion on sale of city property, lot 8D1. It was noted that
leasing was recommended and that selling city property was not under this
committee’s purview. It was recommended to send this issue back to the Port
& Harbor Commission to get their recommendation. The committee addressed
the extended lease of one 40 year term lease with two 10 year extensions. There
was no objection to granting a long term lease due to the expense of setting up
the infrastructure required for a project like this.
ALDERFER/HARVILLE
– MOVED TO RECOMMEND PORT & HARBOR DIRECTOR AND CITY MANAGER TO INCLUDE
ATYPICAL LEASE LENGTHS AS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS PROPOSAL PACKAGE.
There
was no discussion.
VOTE.
YES. NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion
carried.
Mr.
Hawkins reported various lease prices raging from the current tank farm 2008
appraisal was $0.44/sf; the 2007 chip pad land only $0.49/sf; short term lease
on the chip pad to the sulfur load outs and scrap metal was at $0.60/sf. There was
brief discussion on language in the lease policy/proposal process related to current
market rates that offers protection on the lease rates.
There
was no further discussion the Committee asked Mr. Erickson if he would like to
add anything or had questions to ask the committee.
Mr.
Erickson stated that Lot 8D1 had a significant easement that allows access to
Homer Fuel Dock which makes it unusable for Tank Farm on the Harbor side of the
property. He pointed out using the
aerial photo the area of the lot that due to easements would be unusable. There
is 9 years left on the existing lot. If possible in the future could be
re-platted. It was noted possible different rate to accommodate that issue. He
noted that the second portion of his proposal has never made it to discussion
and he proposed at JJ Float adding a fuel dock for boats. It would require
using a portion of Lot 22 for a small tank farm, minimal parking needed and small
warehouse for storage.
The
committee thanked Mr. Erickson for the additional concerns and proposal.
Vice
Chair Alderfer summarized actions taken by the committee.
There
was additional discussion on the pros and cons of selling city owned land on
the spit.
There
was no further discussion.
B. Kachemak Bay Wooden Boat Society
Chair Erickson asked if Mr. Hawkins had additional information. Mr.
Hawkins responded he has not received any thing more. He clarified that it was
along the lines of a boat museum not fish processing for Mr. Abboud. This use
does not fit the current land allocation. A better sit may be better suited. Questions
regarding whether it was longer term and exactly what they are interested.
HARVILLE/HAWKINS - MOVED TO POSTPONE THIS UNTIL MORE INFORMATION IS
RECEIVED.
There was further discussion included not postponing this but
recommending Mr. Hawkins write a letter that addresses the land allocation
designation, that their proposed use would be consider non-conforming use and
not permitted, include a lease proposal package and to find out their intent of
the lease, short term long term, etc.
VOTE. YES. HAWKINS. VELSKO. HARVILLE.
VOTE. NO. ABBOUD. ALDERFER. ERICKSON.
Motion Failed.
ALDERFER/ABBOUD - MOVED TO RECOMMEND MR. HAWKINS WRITE A LETTER TO THE
KACHEMAK WOODEN BOAT SOCIETY TO INFORM THEM OF THE LEASE PROPOSAL PROCESS AND
REQUEST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THEIR INTENT.
There was no further discussion.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
None.
Mrs. Erickson noted
that discussion was warranted by the Committee and the Port & Harbor
Commission on Lot 22. She commented that this was also part of the initial
proposal submitted by Home Run Oil.
Mr. Abboud requested
this to be included on the next agenda.
Mr. Erickson
clarified that the smaller enterprise was contingent upon the larger enterprise
more so than the other way around. It was noted that Lot 22 was withheld from
the last RFP process to be held for possible public access to the new ramp. A
brief discussion on the size of the lots and probable location as close to JJ
ramp as possible would be preferred.
Vice Chair Alderfer
felt that this committee would be reviewing the proposals in January. Mr.
Velsko was concerned that a competing bid may be received on these lots. It was
confirmed that Lot 21 was previously offered for RFP process. Vice Chair Alderfer
recalled the committee recommending in a prior meeting to lease additional lots
on that side of the Spit. It was agreed that it could on the January agenda.
There was no further
discussion.
Chair Erickson
stepped back to the table.
COMMENTS OF THE
None.
COMMENTS OF THE CHAIR
None.
comments of the committee
None.
There being no further business to
come before the Committee, Chair Erickson adjourned the meeting at 4:25
p.m. There will be a Regular Meeting on January 14, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. in
the City Hall Cowles Council Chambers located at 491 E. Pioneer Avenue, Homer,
Renee Krause,
Deputy City Clerk I
Approved: