MEMORANDUM 07-135
TO:
Mayor Hornaday and Homer City Council
FROM: Walt
Wrede
DATE: August 10, 2007
SUBJECT:
Ordinance 07-27 A.
Ordinance 07-27 (A) is the ordinance that if adopted, would
place a proposition on the October election ballot which asks the voters to
authorize the Council to borrow up to $7 Million dollars to construct City Hall
and the Town Plaza.
This ordinance is scheduled for a public hearing and second reading at the
meeting on Monday, August 13. Ordinance 07-27 (A) is the amended ordinance and
contains the amendments made by motion on the floor at the last meeting. This
is the ordinance on the floor Monday.
The agenda also contains Ordinance 07-27 (A) (S). This
proposed substitute ordinance contains the additional suggested amendments
offered by Gordon that I told you about and quoted at the previous meeting.
This ordinance is not on the floor at present but is a proposed substitute for
Ordinance 07-27 (A).
I was the sponsor of the original ordinance; Ordinance 07-27
(A). My reasons for bringing the ordinance forward at this time were outlined
in Memorandum 07-109. You will recall that the primary reasons for doing so
were:
- To put
the Council in position to proceed with the construction schedule if it
decides to enter into a MACC Agreement
and Construction Contract in March.
- To
save money by avoiding a special election this winter
- To
take advantage of a larger voter turnout in the General Election
- To get
an early signal from the public about support for this project so that the
Council would have time to react and adjust its approach and strategy
before March.
I am writing to let you know that there have been some new
developments and new information that has come to my attention since this
ordinance was introduced that has changed my thinking regarding whether it is
prudent to take this issue to the voters now. On balance, I now think it would
be best to postpone this ordinance and have a special election in the winter.
My reasons for this change of heart include:
- Loan
Options Diminished: As you know, the ballot proposition in this
Ordinance authorizes the Council to borrow money. It does not authorize
the Council to sell bonds. Selling bonds is another way to borrow money
but it would require a completely different ordinance, a completely
different proposition, and a specialized bond attorney. Going this route
is more complex and expensive. There was no way an ordinance of this type
could have been ready in time for this election and we do not presently have
enough information to prepare one even if we wanted to. I was confident
that there were enough relatively simple loan options, either through
public agencies or private lending institutions, that the Council could
find good financing and have the construction money in place by March.
However, I recently learned that USDA will no longer loan money directly
and will require that the City sell bonds before it participates. This is
the agency that the City borrowed money from for the Library. I considered
them one of our best options. The bottom line is that the range of loan
options has been narrowed significantly and the likelihood that the City
would have to bond if it borrows money has increased. This means that the
City might have to take this to the voters twice if the voters approve
this proposition and the Council later decides it is best to sell bonds. I
don’t think that is a good idea.
- The
Impact of Ordinance 07-18 (S). I recently met with a group of
volunteers that are organizing themselves to mount an independent public
education campaign for Ordinance 07-27 (A). The members have a great deal
of experience with campaigns in Homer. They expressed strong reservations
about having this proposition appear on the ballot next to the proposition
contained in Ordinance 07-18 (S). They said they were afraid that having
these two propositions side by side could be confusing to voters and might
result in hard to interpret results for both. They stated further that the
Ordinance 07-18 (S) proposition is complex and has many components and it
was unclear what effect it might ultimately have on the fate of the loan
proposition. In short, the committee members believe there will be strong
support for the City Hall / Town Center Project and they would prefer a
straight up or down vote on the loan proposition. They would prefer it to
be the only proposition on the ballot.
- Taking
This to the Voters Now is Premature; During the past two weeks I have
become more convinced that this ordinance may be premature and that it would
be better to wait and have a special election this winter, even if it
costs $10,000 or thereabouts. That is really not a lot of money compared
to the project cost and it is important that we get the right question on
the ballot. The Committee expressed similar sentiments. Following are some
reasons to have a special election in January or March.
1. If
the Ordinance 07-18 (S) proposition makes it on the ballot and the voters
approve it, the City will have an identified source of revenue to make loan
payments. That might make it easier to ask for approval from the voters to
incur long- term debt. It might also have an impact on Council’s decision about
which financing mechanism to use and whether it is even necessary to take a
proposition to the voters. For example, if the money raised by the tax increase
is enough to make loan payments, the City could sell Revenue Bonds which do not
require voter authorization.
2. If
Council waits until January or February, it will have a finance plan available
to it which will offer current comparisons of various financing mechanisms,
rates, terms, and long range costs. Council might for example, decide that it
is in its best interest to self finance or to lease with the option to own. In
that case, it would not take a proposition to the voters at all.
3. Waiting
until winter would allow the public to make a much more informed decision on
whether to borrow money for this project. By January, the City should have much
more information on financing options and terms, refined costs estimates, an
approved project budget, and a preliminary design for both City Hall and Town
Plaza that has been reviewed by the
community. In other words, the public would have a much better idea what it was
voting on. If Council took this to the voters now, we would be asking them to
take a tremendous leap of faith.
RECOMMENDATION:
Proceed with the public hearing, adopt a motion to substitute Ordinance
07-27 (A) (S) for Ordinance 07-27 (A), and Adopt a motion to postpone Ordinance
07-27 (A) (S) until December
10, 2007.