|
Planning & Zoning Telephone (907)
235-3106
M E M O R A N D U M 08-123
TO: MAYOR HORNADAY AND HOMER CITY COUNCIL
WALT
WREDE, CITY MANAGER
FROM: RICK ABBOUD, CI
DA
SUBJEC
Introduction:
Draft Ordinance 08-30(s),
sponsored by Councilwomen Howard, was provided to the HAPC for a
recommendation. There were public
hearings held at both the August 6th and August 20th HAPC
meetings.
Discussion:
No one spoke and no discussion was held at
the August 6th meeting. One citizen spoke at the August 20th
meeting and questioned the need to put a finite square footage limit to
commercial structures, citing that current development regulation adequately
addressed the issue. A discussion of the HAPC ensued, in summary; the HAPC
voted 5-1 to not impose size limitations, finding that 75,000 square feet was
an arbitrary number and existing regulations adequately addressed their
concerns relating to large commercial development.
Recommendation:
Excerpts from the
City Planner Abboud
reviewed the staff report.
Chair Kranich noted there w
There were no public
comments.
Chair Kranich closed the
public hearing.
There were no commission
comments.
City Planner Abboud reviewed the staff report.
Chair Minsch opened the public hearing.
Kevin Hogan, City resident, commented that they
need to watch out for unintended consequences. He thinks we all realize what
drove the size limitations in the first place, the big box store issue. He
thinks right now this is a self-limiting defacto limitation on size with the
30% foot print, as there are not very many lots in the districts that can
accommodate a huge building, unless you start combining lots. We don’t know
what we could need in the future, it might be a high school or a super sized
hospital, he doesn’t think size limits are something that need to be on the
books at all. It was successful in keeping out Fred Meyer, but maybe that isn’t
what the community wanted. He would prefer that there isn’t a size limit at all
and they go with the 30% lot usage. His concern is what if this is put in and
then something comes along that we haven’t thought about. We need something
that is a huge building. If we don’t need it, don’t do it.
Barbara Howard, City Council member, commented that
we have some tidy up work to do as a result of the lawsuit. We put in place
ordinances that take us back to square one. The ordinance before the Commission
tonight is to take it to where we were prior to where we were before the
supreme the court ruling, except town square was not included because it was
not part of the lawsuit.
Commissioner Kranich asked if they feel that by
increasing the rest of the
Commissioner Storm questioned why 75,000 square
feet was chosen. Councilmember Howard responded that there was no specific
purpose behind the number, but it would allow 9,000 or 10,000 square feet
remodel capabilities to some of the existing stores that are getting close to
their max. Safeway or Ulmer’s for example. She expressed that there is some
merit to Mr. Hogan’s point about the percentage for the footprint. Her goal was
to get it back where we were and bump it up a little bit. She is eager to hear
the Commission’s discussion and what they find is the best thing to do at this
time.
There were no more public comments. Chair Minsch
closed the public hearing.
Question was raised regarding the size of Safeway
and Ulmer’s. Planning Technician Engebretsen said she thinks they are at about
30,000 square feet. Kachemak Gear Shed is larger at about 40,000 square feet.
STORM/KRANICH MOVED TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 08-30(S)
Commissioner Storm expressed her support for the
ordinance and her reason for not taking out the size limitation is 75,000
square feet is a lot of space for a town the size of Homer. Also if you take
out the size limitations there is the possibility of someone coming in a buying
up quite a number of lots and removing the lot lines and getting around size
limitations.
Commissioner Kranich commented if we were to look
at 2 acres with the 30% coverage limitation it would be around 28,000 square
feet. To have the parking associated with something 75,000 square feet; the
property would have to be 6 to 7 acres to accommodate the parking. He doesn’t
know if it would work based on 30% if we get rid of the size limit we may have
to rethink the coverage percentage and it may be upward of 30%.
Commissioner Sinn questioned if this is adopted
what w
Planning Technician Engebretsen clarified that the
30% lot coverage in the business district triggers a conditional use permit, it
is not a size cap. The only limitation in code is the 66,000 square feet.
There were no further comments Chair Minsch asked
for a role call.
VOTE: YES: STORM
NO:
BOS, MINSCH, MOORE, KRANICH, SINN
Motion failed.
Chair Minsch noted that they need to adopt findings
to support the action. She called for a short break at
SINN/BOS MOVED TO ADOPT A FINDING IT IS NOT
APPROPRIATE TO
There was no discussion.
VOTE: YES: MOORE, MINSCH, KRANICH, SINN, BOS
NO:
STORM
Motion carried.
KRANICH/BOS MOVED TO ADD A FINDING THAT THE HOMER
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE
There was no discussion.
VOTE: YES: MOORE, SINN, KRANICH, BOS
NO:
STORM, MINSCH
Motion carried.
Chair Minsch asked if the Commission wanted to
adopt any staff findings that support the comprehensive plan.
KRANICH/SINN MOVED TO ADOPT FINDING 1.
Large retail is associated with the creation
of year-round employment which supports the goal listed in the Homer
Comprehensive Plan Update (HCPU) (p.9).
There
was no discussion.
VOTE:
YES: MINSCH, KRANICH, SINN, BOS, MOORE
NO: STORM
Motion
carried.
The
Commission reviewed code relating to finding 3.
KRANICH/MOORE
MOVED TO ADOPT FINDING 3.
Chapter 21.57 of the
There was no discussion.
VOTE: YES: SINN, BOS, MINSCH, MOORE, KRANICH
NO: STORM
Motion carried.
There were no more findings proposed.
Chair Minsch entertained a motion to suspend the
rules and postpone this item until Commissioner Zak returns.
KRANICH/STORM SO MOVED.
There was no discussion.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
The Commission discussed their new business and
informational items.
Chair Minsch called for a recess at