Session 08-25 a Special Meeting
of the Homer City Council was called to order on September 15,
2008 at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor
Hornaday at the City Hall Cowles Council Chambers located at 491 E. Pioneer Avenue, Homer, Alaska and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HEIMBUCH, NOVAK, ROBERTS, WYTHE
ABSENT: HOWARD,
SHADLE (Both Excused)
STAFF: CITY MANAGER WREDE
DEPUTY
CITY CLERK JACOBSEN
SPECIAL
PROJECTS COORDINATOR HOLEN
AGENDA
APPROVAL (Only those matters on the
noticed agenda may be considered, pursuant to City Council’s Operating Manual,
pg. 5)
The agenda approved by
consensus of the Commission.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Resolution
08-95(S), A Resolution of the City Council
of Homer, Alaska, Supporting
Designation of the North and South
Sterling Byways as National Scenic Byways. City
Manager.
City Manager
Wrede explained that this was postponed until September 22nd, but he
found out the Borough Assembly is considering a similar resolution at the
Assembly meeting on the 16th and he sponsors don’t want to unless
the City has passed this. The Mayor agreed to bring it back tonight. City
Manager Wrede pointed out the substitute whereas or they could amend to delete
it and the one above it.
ROBERTS/WYTHE
MOVED TO ADOPT THE SUBSTITUTE RESOLUTION WITH THE AMENDED WHEREAS.
There was
brief discussion.
VOTE: NON
OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT
Motion
carried.
B. Capital Improvement Plan and FY 2010
Legislative Requests
1. Presentation
by Proposers of New Projects
2. Capital
Improvement Plan and Draft Resolution
Mayor Hornaday reviewed the information being
discussed and encouraged audience members to pick up copies provided for
reference. He gave an overview of how the projects are presented, explaining
that the City does not have a lobbyist and the Mayor and Councilmembers who
usually presents to the Legislature. In the last several years Legislators have
been tell the non-profit’s that in order to have a project considered by the Legislature,
the projects need to be on the City’s list in some fashion. Legislators have
indicated that the next two years are going to be heavy capitol budget years
and in three years it is going to slack off. Financially the City is in a
better position now than four years ago. In an unqualified opinion from the
auditor we are operating in accordance with the standard accounting principles.
This year Council is giving those with new projects an opportunity to give
brief presentations on their projects. Mayor Hornaday noted that the City has
seen tremendous increases in costs for energy and projected sales tax revenues
are down. He reviewed the City’s contributions to non profits and the Homer
Foundations disbursement of City funds.
Miranda Weiss, Development Director at the Pratt Museum, thanked Mayor and Council for the opportunity to
speak tonight. She thanked the City for its help with replacing the museums
fuel tank and for their continuing investment in the museum in terms of annual
operating support. The City’s continued support helps them leverage other
funders. Presently one of the Directors with the Institute of Museum
and Library Services, a federal agency, is visiting the museum. She points out
that they are a national leader in engaging our community and it is invaluable
for her to see that the community invests in the museum. In terms of their
capital improvement project, they have done extensive study, assessment, and
evaluation for this project, which is renovation of their building and improvement
of their 8 acres. It is the largest project they have undertaken. The studies
have included handicap accessibility, site planning, building assessment as a
whole, collection storage space, and the studies have shown they need to move
ahead with this project. They are well positioned to take on this project. The
Patrons of the Pratt Society paid off the mortgage after helping them acquire 8
acres of land. They have been operating in the black for the last number of
years, and their programs are busting out of the museum. As noted in their project description the
museum has been initiated into the Rasmussen Foundation’s predevelopment
program, a type of incubation program to ensure capital projects in the state
are sound, well planned, and will be sustainably
funded afterward. The City’s support in having this project listed on the CIP
list will be invaluable, in part because it will help them leverage other support. Ms. Weiss encouraged Council to
consider their roof project for their short list so the museum might be able to
have support through the state. The roof is the most urgent project now that
the fuel tank is done. She noted that investing in the Pratt is investing in
quality of life here. The museum gets more than 35,000 visitors and serves more
than 4,000 students through the year. The Pratt won an award in 2005 and they
continue to receive national attention for what happens in the museum. Ms.
Weiss said she just left the museum and there were about 30 people there
discussing a community boat house and what it could look like. She thanked
Council for their continued investment in the Pratt.
Mayor Hornaday questioned funding for the phase I, Ms.
Weiss said she expects the funding will be private and public; they are in the
process of developing their fundraising plan. She noted that the numbers are
old and the updated numbers are larger. The roof portion will stay the same at
$319,000.
Councilmember Heimbuch asked about the impact for the
Pratt if Council was forced to cut back on their funding. Ms. Weiss said it is
an issue that has been discussed and the loss would be significant. She noted
it is about 10% of their annual budget. Looking at contingencies is something
they do every year.
Councilmember Heimbuch expressed concern that if the
ballot measure for the food exemption on sales tax passes the City may be in a
situation where they have to decide to cut a program entirely or decrease
everybody commensurately. He encouraged
everyone with a project before the Council to keep that in mind. Mayor Hornaday
added that if the proposition passes the City expects to lose somewhere between
$800,000 to $1,000,000.
Fred Lau, Director of Homer Senior Citizens, thanked
the Council for support this last year. He said they were able to leverage the
funds to get additional funding for operations at the Senior Center. He said right now he can’t answer what impact losing
City funding would have on the program, but they have operated without City
funds before. The Senior Citizens project is similar to what they have had
before that has been included in the CIP list. They aren’t asking for City
funding, but to be included on the CIP to leverage additional funds with our
Legislator. The funding for this project will come from Alaska Housing Finance, the Denali Commission, home
improvement funds, and from Homer Senior Citizens. Homer Senior Citizens has
always put a substantial amount of money into their own projects and since 2003
they have built 17 new units.
In response to questions Mr. Lau said that although
they are not asking for specific funding from the City, the Legislatures
feeling is that if it is on the CIP, the City supports the project and it is an
important project in the community. Last year the Homer Senior Citizens
received $20,000 from the Homer Foundation. It was used as leverage funds for
our nutrition and transportation program and their adult day services program.
They leveraged about $139,000 for each program.
Judith Lund commented on behalf of the South Peninsula
Hospital Board. The Board is requesting their project for the new MRI and MRI building be moved to the top of the hospital’s list
of items requested for funding. What has happened is the MRI that currently at the hospital is housed in a trailer and is a rented
unit, is now obsolete, and cannot be upgraded as there is no software for it.
When this year is over it will be effectively useless. They either need to rent
another MRI or purchase one. Purchasing will be more cost effective in the long term. They are trying to raise
funds to purchase. When asked if they have had any indication from Health and
Social Services about getting it on the Governor’s capital budget this year.
She explained that she is not sure, there is new
management and a new Service Area Board that was just appointed. They don’t
have a lot put together yet on this project, it is too late to have it on the
ballot, and they are trying to raise funding on their
own. They have put information out, but have not heard from Health and Social
Services.
Cinda Eckert commented on behalf of the Homer Hockey
Association. She thanked the City for past support and advised Council that
they have recently purchased their building for Two and a quarter million dollars. The owner has agreed to owner finance the building and
they will lease the land from the owner. They have interest
only payments for a 5 year period, and then they can re-amortize the remaining
debt at the end of the 5 year period in to principal and interest payments for
the remaining 25 years. Now that the change of ownership has taken place the
Association feels confident they can raise the money through grant sources to
reduce the principal to a point they can manage the payments after that five
year period. In an effort to expand the usage of the facility and increase
revenues it was suggested they put in a concrete floor. Based on research done
with the contractor, the cost of converting the sand based floor is $350,000
which includes a $50,000 contingency fee for material cost increase and use of
architect and/or engineer. It would benefit the community and state as it would
be an additional venue for trade shows, conventions, and things like that. It
would not only increase Homer’s revenues, but also Homer Hockey Association. It
closes that gap between seasons by bringing in an additional $30,000 to $40,000
estimated annually. The concrete floor would greatly increase the uses for the
building and for Homer. Mrs. Eckert said she did a presentation at the Kachemak
City Council meeting. They were very interested and agreed to place their
project on their CIP list and have agreed to match 1% for this project.
Representative Seaton was in attendance and noted that it is nice to have a 10%
match when bringing in a request like this. She asked the Council to consider that
as well and its benefits to Homer and to their association. If they are so
inclined to provide some matching money, they would accept it, and will be looking for other sources as well. She explained the benefits of
having the concrete floor with relation to utility costs and increased uses in
the summer.
Mayor Hornaday suggested contacting the US Department
of Agriculture regarding financial support. The City received funding for the
library from them. He asked for clarification if the Association is just
looking for matching funding. Mrs.
Eckert responded that first they are asking for support to get on the list.
Secondly if Council is inclined to give some matching money, it would be
greatly appreciated.
Bob Letson, CEO at South Peninsula Hospital, filled in some additional information to what was
mentioned earlier. He said they are not asking for funds from the City but
would like to be on the CIP list because they are trying to gain community
support and achieve funding. He stressed the importance of replacing the MRI and provided a photo of location of the existing unit. He noted the
present MRI lease expires in June of next year. It is not able to
have any software upgrades, it is five software upgrades behind, and it is
totally obsolete. Right now it is in a mobile unit as shown in the photo, and
they need a building to house a new unit because presently patients are exposed
to inclement weather and it is not convenient for the elderly or disabled. The
unit will have to be replaced in July and the new unit will be able to accommodate patients that are larger or claustrophobic. The
unit serves a population of about 12,000 with Homer and surrounding communities
and an MRI is essential for physicians to diagnose a multitude
of medical conditions, and it is used quite often in trauma. It is important to
the revenue stream of the hospital as it brings in about $1 million a year before expenses. The cost for the MRI is in the neighborhood of $1,800,000 for the unit. To build a building
would be another $500,000 to $700,000. They are seeking funding from all the
sources they can. An obvious alternative would be to lease a unit; however it
is very expensive to lease a unit. Currently it costs several hundred thousand
dollars in interest, as well as $84,000 a year in the cost of the van and
maintenance, which would go away if they had a building.
In response to questions Mr. Letson commented that
after all expenses the MRI generates $400,000 a year. The lifespan of the unit
is about 6 to 7 years and if they are able to continue with software upgrades
it could go longer. Over the life of the unit, about 25% of the cost is
reimbursable by Medicare. There is no direct tie in for a designation for a
critical care hospital. They did get their approval effective August 7th
which is very helpful with Medicare reimbursement. The MRI is essential to the development of our hospital. It is very important
in physician recruitment in that many physicians depend on the MRI for their practice. It is very important in the range of service for SPH to be a viable hospital. In a lot of cases there is no equivalent
diagnostic tool to an MRI. The MRI prevents
exploratory surgery in some cases, it can do some preventive heart diagnosis,
and it is an early detector of cancer and tumors. It can hit each level of
tissue, unlike an x-ray looking at the bone. It is a wonderful diagnostic tool
saving money in terms of exploratory surgery and cutting back on hospital
stays. The current access to the van is through a door from the x-ray department.
There is a wooden canopy that is damp and cold a lot of the year. It is really
not a good situation right now, which is why they are looking a doing a
building as part of this.
Planning Technician Engebretsen spoke regarding the
Beluga Slough Trail Reconstruction. It is the boardwalk that goes from the Islands and Ocean visitor center to Bishops Beach. She reported that Islands and Ocean has removed the portion of the boardwalk that crosses their
property. The remainder that is on City property is in a state of disrepair. It
is an expensive project and the City will likely have to apply for grants for it, but the first step is to get
it on the CIP as a project of need for the community for granting agencies. In
response to questions Planning Technician Engebretsen commented that part of
the criteria for this is to make it handicap accessible. Islands and Ocean has
over 70,000 visitors per year and a lot of folks take the guided walks down to Bishops Beach so it only makes sense to make it as accessible as
possible.
Planning Technician Engebretsen also spoke regarding
the project for the Bishops Beach picnic shelter. She explained that the existing
shelter is safe, but it is an aging structure built around 1980 with help from
the Coast Guard and eventually it will need to be replaced. She is not sure that the cost listed is correct.
Mrs. Engebretsen noted that it is leaning but Parks Maintenance Coordinator
Hagerty checks it regularly to make sure it is not getting worse. She
anticipates that a new shelter would be placed in the same location.
City Manager Wrede commented regarding the
Brush/Wildland Firefighting Truck. He said the City would benefit from a brush
fire truck that is able to get to roads that are inaccessible in the winter
time or not built to City road standards, making it impossible to get a tanker
truck or engine in. There is also wildfire danger on the edges of the City with
the dead spruce. The truck the City is using is old and was converted from a
former utility vehicle. The new vehicle would give expanded coverage to areas
that can’t be reached now. It is not an immediate need and the Fire Chief has
it scheduled for 2011.
There was brief discussion regarding the new priority
level. Special Projects Coordinator Holen explained that they got rid of the
terms necessary, essential, and so forth and replaced them with priority levels
1, 2, and 3. Level 1 would be the highest priority and level 3 would be lowest.
It would be up to Council and Administration to consider a number of factors in
deciding the level of a project.
City Manager Wrede commented regarding the Community
Recreation/Multi Use Center. He noted that it is scheduled after 2014.
Community Schools Coordinator Illg hopes at some point the City will have a Parks and Recreation Department and the City will be involved in recreation projects. With the discussion about need for
youth activities and programs, this is something Mr. Illg wanted to propose,
but understands it is something that can’t be accomplished soon.
City Manager Wrede commented regarding Fire Engine 4
Refurbishment. He explained the City has a new fire engine that will be here in October. There has been a promise for some time that there
would be a fire presence on Skyline Drive and consideration that the old water treatment plant
might be used as a station or garage if the building is able to support it. If
engine 4 is refurbished it could be located on site to help fill the need on Skyline Drive. There was discussion that there are volunteer fire
fighters who could respond to a station on Skyline Drive rather than having an employee there.
City Manager Wrede commented regarding the Fire Pump
Testing Trailer. The Fire Department is required to regularly test their
pumpers and fire hoses. At times they have to pump so much water from the fire
hydrants that it upsets the system and causes disruption to residential
service, or too much sediment gets stirred up. Another option is using Beluga Lake, but that has its own set of problems including going
across private land and sucking up sediment that messes up the pumps. This new
system is self contained and allows them to do their testing without tapping
into the water system. There was brief discussion that this may be something
that could be shared with the Borough in an effort to alleviate some of the
cost to the City.
Nicky Szarzi of the Sport Fish Division of Fish in
Homer and Game and Port and Harbor Director Hawkins commented regarding Fishing
Lagoon Improvements. She gave a brief history of the development of the fishing
lagoon. The intent of the lagoon is to provide more road accessible shore based
fishing and protect wild stocks in the local streams. She said the lagoon
rivals the number of king and silver salmon caught and number of anglers at Anchor River, Deep Creek, Ninilchik, and Stariski Creek combined,
also shore base angling in Seward and Ship Creek in Anchorage. It has been quite a successful project. The City
expanded the fishing lagoon in 1994 and since then the most recent major
improvement was the addition of the handicap ramp and the hardening of the
outer berm. It was a joint project in conjunction with the spit bike path. The
City signed an MOU to perform day to day maintenance to keep the ADA improvements open and to maintain the berm. It has
been about 10 years since the outer berm of the lagoon was hardened and the
southern berm has been stable. The northern berm was damaged after the
improvements and has required an addition of material from the harbor dredging
each year. Port and Harbor Director Hawkins has been working with the DOT
engineer who helped design the berm to estimate the cost to fix it and has
found the cost is less than projected at $200,000. The lagoon is slowly filling in with sediment because of the dredge spoils. This summer the king
salmon smolt suffered high mortality possibly due to low oxygen created because
there wasn’t enough space between the pens and the bottom. A gravel bar formed
on the south side entrance that was removed by Fish and Game and the Harbormaster
for about $10,000. A larger gravel bar is forming on the north side entrance
that needs removal. Ms. Szarzi explained that Fish and Game can still pay for large boating projects but no longer have non boating funds
for improvements to the lagoon. After discussion with Port and Harbor Director
Hawkins about funding for the upgrades to the lagoon, they are asking that the
project be added to the short list for funding from legislature. It is listed
as priority 2 but should be a top priority to the City because it is costing
money annually to upgrade the berm with dredge spoils. In response to questions
Ms. Szarzi said she is not aware of any City projects that have had a negative
impact to the berm. She feels the berm fix would be the priority to the project
and the gravel bar fix could be added to it. Port and Harbor Director Hawkins
concurred that the equipment is out there they could deal with the gravel bar.
It would be recommended that the lagoon be dredged as the same time as the
harbor as it is shallower than it used to be.
Port and Harbor Director Hawkins commented regarding
the Harbor Float and Ramp 3 Replacement. He explained replacing the float and
putting the old ramp to it wouldn’t resolve the issue. Ramp three is the last
original ramp in the harbor and in upgrading it would have to be ADA acceptable. It makes sense to put the two projects
together.
Mayor Hornaday commented that in previous trips to Juneau former Councilmember McLay would talk to the
Department of Transportation regarding Harbors. Other communities have received
funding and questioned why Homer hasn’t.
There was discussion that Representative Seaton’s
office is aware of this and there is a good chance of it getting funded. The ADA part is important as this ramp is the most centrally
located in the harbor and generally there is a problem with ADA accessibility in the harbor. Port and Harbor Director
Hawkins noted that the cost listed is current.
Public Works Director Meyer commented regarding the
Sewer Treatment Plant/Bio-Solids Treatment Plant. He noted that a grant has
been applied for to accomplish the design. He gave an overview of the sludge
process. This project brings in a mechanical dewatering process for the sludge.
A small anaerobic digester would do what is happening now in the lagoon.
Methane would be given off and used in energy recovery. The other part of the
project would be to utilize a portion of the lagoon to solve the inflow and
infiltration (I and I) problem. During the wet season they get a lot of water
running down the pipes to the sewer treatment plant in excess of its hydraulic
capacity. The high flows could be diverted to the lagoon which would allow them
to store it for a short time and then slowly release it to the treatment plant
when the flows have fallen. This would allow the City to stay within the
discharge permit. The part of the lagoon that wouldn’t be used could be filled and used in the future for a new Public Works complex.
There was brief discussion about homeowners who tie
sump pumps, footing drains, and roof drains in to the sewer line which causes
the water in excess of the plants hydraulic capacity. Finding those connections
is very challenging in the City. Regarding unacceptable fecal and coliform
levels Public Works Director Meyer commented that maybe once or twice over the
last several years has there been an issue. He explained that the water that
leaves the treatment plant is not chlorinated because it goes to a natural
environment; it goes through an ultra violet process. The problems that create
the violations for the most part are hydraulic problems only. If a plant was
designed to eliminate any violations it would have to be a larger capacity. The
current plant designed for 880,000 gallons a day, during the wet seasons they
can experience a million and a half to two million gallons a day. The extra capacity would cost money. The I and I
takes away from the capacity a few days a year. The excess surface water/ground
water that enters the sanitary sewer takes away from treatment capacity.
Without that excess the plant lasts longer.
Councilmember Roberts commented that this project is
very innovative and though the number looks big it is probably a significant
savings over the long term and solves what could be a very big problem to the City.
This could be a way to help the system grow.
Public Works Director Meyer commented regarding the
Water Storage/Distribution Improvements. He explained there are two
transmission lines, one behind the hospital and down the bluff and one down
East Hill. This project would connect the two together to
create a pressure zone that goes all the way across. It would benefit the
community in having more than one way to get water to different areas of town.
The water/sewer master plan calls for some additional storage in the event of
an emergency. Right now we could use some additional storage and it would make
the system work more effectively. In response to questioning as to why this is
recommended to come first before West Hill, Public Works Director Meyer commented that this is a rapidly growing
area with the largest subdivision that has been approved in the City being
contemplated in this location. It is developing that void between the
transmission main that comes down East Hill and the one behind the hospital. He recognizes the need on West Hill and a letter was sent out to property owners that are adjacent to the
West Hill alignment and about 30-40% was interested. The other
issue is that if we are going to provide water to lots we need to be providing
sewer at the same time and to provide sewer to that alignment is problematic
along West Hill.
Public Works Director Meyer commented regarding the Lake Street improvements, noting that it probably has the most
serious pavement problem in Homer. It is not a City of Homer responsibility and this is in the CIP to encourage
the State to do something with their right-of-way.
Discussion ensued on how to proceed with the process.
Mayor Hornaday commented that they may want to
consider hiring a lobbyist for these next two years. The legislators like to
have these smaller projects on the list, because money comes up that we don’t
even know about. Representative Seaton has explained that they have to be on
the list. It doesn’t have to be the top 15 list, but on the City’s CIP list.
There is no way of predicting the dynamics of the legislature, but word is that
there will be a lot of funding for capital projects. If the City
isn’t going to hire a lobbyist, then consideration should be given for the City
Manager to spend a session in Juneau and work on it.
Councilmember Novak questioned if the non profits not
being included in the City’s top 15 would affect their ability to get funding.
Councilmember Wythe recommended the CIP should include
City projects that fall within the 2009-2014 time frames. There are 8 state
projects and 8 non profit projects that could be separated out into different
sections or appendices, but included in the CIP booklet. Anything beyond the
2014 scope could be included in a long range plan appendix. She noted that
there are projects that may have been a priority before but as time has passed
their need or viability has changed and perhaps needs to come off the list.
Councilmember Roberts commented that all of the
projects that were presented tonight have validity to be on the City’s CIP
list. She noted that Special Projects Coordinator Holen has a statement that
the City recognizes these non profits as significant value to the Homer
Community would address Councilmember Novak’s concern.
City Manager Wrede commented anything Council votes on
to the top 15 priority list would be rated as priority level 1 because there is
an immediate need, there is funding in the pipeline, or history with the
project. Council can adjust the priority levels if deemed necessary.
Representative Seaton made it clear the non profits don’t have to be on the top
15 list, they just need to be on the CIP list to show they are endorsed by the
City. Representative Seaton also pointed out that the legislature and Governor’s
Office don’t want to be seen as picking projects out of the blue. Council did
more to vet tonight than they ever have by letting people come and present
their projects. Council can say they understand them and their benefits to the
Community.
Councilmember Heimbuch commented his understanding
that Council is trying to get a City project CIP list that started to have a
life of its own and some continuity. They need to continue to pay attention to
that aspect. We have to develop a CIP that is practical, reasonable, and
reflects our ability to do these things. We need to have projects the people
can decide if it is in the scale and scope of the City can reasonably
accomplish in a five year plan. State and Federal projects need to be separated
out to be dealt with at the appropriate level.
Councilmember Novak expressed the importance of
maintaining a section to include projects past the 2014 date to show long term
planning.
There was further discussion on priority lists for
projects and seeking funding for projects.
WYTHE/HEIMBUCH MOVED THAT IN OUR 2009-2014 CIP WE
INCLUDE ONLY THE CITY PROJECTS THAT HAVE A COMPLETION DATE BETWEEN
2009-2014, WE WOULD INCLUDE ALL OF THE
STATE ROAD PROJECTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY INCLUDED, AND ALL OF THE PROPOSED NON PROFIT ITEMS, TO BE A TOTAL OF 8 STATE ROADS AND 8 NON PROFIT ITEMS LISTED AS APPENDICES OR SEPARATE SECTIONS OF THE
OVERALL LIST. THERE WOULD BE THE CITY LIST, THE NON CITY PROJECTS, BUT OF INTEREST TO THE CITY, AND THE PROJECTS PROPOSED BY OTHER ORGANIZATIONS.
NOVAK MOVED FOR A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO ADD THE
ADDITIONAL PROJECTS BEYOND 2014 AS AN APPENDIX TO THIS LIST.
It would be an appendix subsequent to the list.
VOTE (Friendly amendment): NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS
CONSENT.
Motion carried.
At this time it is to allocate the time frame the City
projects have to fall with in order to be included and considered, and ensuring
the state and non profit items would be included in the book.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT
Motion carried.
WYTHE/ROBERTS MOVED THAT AT OUR FUTURE MEETING WE COME
PREPARED TO REVIEW ALL OF THE ITEMS THAT FALL IN THE DATE LINE 2009-2014 AND HAVE OUR DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER WE WOULD VOTE TO CONTINUE
INCLUDING THEM OR CONSIDER THEM FOR REMOVAL FROM THE LIST.
There was brief discussion.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
WYTHE/ROBERTS MOVED THAT AT OUR NEXT PROGRESS MEETING
THAT WE BE PREPARED TO ASSIGN THE VALUE 1, 2, OR 3, TO THOSE PLANS. ITEMS 3 ARE LONG RANGE, ITEMS 2 ARE NEAR
RANGE, AND ITEMS 1 ARE PRIORITY FOR THIS TIME FRAME RIGHT NOW.
There was brief discussion.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT
Motion carried.
COMMENTS OF THE AUDIENCE
Bumppo Bremicker commented regarding Kachemak Drive pathway. It is a state road so would need to be state
funded. The City pushing for those state funded projects is very important. He
sees this not only as a recreational thing, but also as a safety issue. The
shoulder is inches wide, the ditches are really deep, traffic runs pretty fast,
and there are people walking and biking it. It is a dangerous situation. Having
a pathway along there would be a really good thing. He encouraged them to get
it to the state.
Special Projects Coordinator Holen commented regarding
the resolution passed last year that noted State project requests as well as
Federal project requests. She had brief discussion with Councilmember Wythe on
City projects versus State projects.
Leonard Wells commented that he thinks the projects brought
forward this evening should be given great consideration and be on the list
someplace unless there are specific reasons not to include them. He asked if
Councilmember Wythe intended the 2014 to be the completion date or started by
2014. Councilmember Wythe responded it is the scheduled year, not necessarily
the completion date.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the
Council the Special Meeting was adjourned at 9:47 p.m. by Mayor James C. Hornaday. The next Regular Meeting
is scheduled for Monday, September 22, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. The next Special Meeting is scheduled for September 22,
2008 at 5:30 p.m. and the next Committee of the Whole is scheduled for September
22, 2008 at 4:00 p.m. All meetings will be held in the City Hall Cowles Council Chambers located at 491 E. Pioneer Avenue, Homer, Alaska.
MELISSA
JACOBSEN, CMC, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Approved: