Public Art Committee Meeting Synopsis
March 23, 2006
Cowles Council Chambers
Present: Connie Alderfer, Gale Parsons, Dave Anderson,
Angie Newby
Absent: Ron Senungetuk, Asia Freeman, Mike Yourkowski
Public:
Staff: Rachel Livingston
The minutes from the 2/9 /06
meeting were approved. Discussion on the
draft letter to Fred Meyer led to approving the letter to be sent to the appropriate
parties after Rachel types up appropriate Public Art Committee letter head and
edits the letter to reflect the committee’s wishes rather than sounding like it
is from one individual.
Regarding the Town Center
project, the new date for introduction of the Town Center Reso drafted by the
Public Art Committee for the Planning Commission is April 5th. Rachel will call Mike and Asia to make sure
they will attend this meeting, if one of them cannot make it, Angie volunteered
for back up.
The Animal Shelter art
opening is slated for June 2. The sign
is in Anchorage for final powder coating and should be delivered to Public Works
in the next two weeks. Tammy at Public
Works is taking the lead on installing the sign and this will be done in the
month of May, weather permitting. Connie
asked about details of the opening, i.e. invitations, advertising, food. HAF has agreed to put together some
food. The committee discussed the lack
of money for invitations and advertising and decided no invitations however
there are lots of opportunities for free advertising: first Friday page in local papers and a
possible article, KBBI community calendar and coffee table, HCOA newsletter and
web events page, Chamber of Commerce, ect.
Rachel and Gale will work on
a to-do list for future events.
The administrative guidelines
were discussed next. Ron Senungetuk was
not able to attend the meeting however he did drop off several documents from
his past experience on an art project.
Documents included an art contract for the Fairbanks courthouse, an art
RFP for the Fairbanks courthouse and, an informational pamphlet introducing the
new art within the courthouse. Connie
suggested that the committee take home the materials and look them over so we
can focus on them at the next meeting when Ron is present. Connie also mentioned that she found someone
who can clean up/ edit the final Administrative Guidelines when we are nearing
completion.
Connie spoke of Ron’s past
comments encouraging this committee to step back from offering too many opinions
on what art is selected. This is in
regards to the one member of the public art committee who is on the selection
committee. The Public Art Committee can
be a part of the selection committee but should not be the Chair. Ron felt that there should be a long distance
between the Public Art Committee member and the actual selection of art. Angie agreed.
Gale also agreed and spoke about the importance of having a selection
committee much earlier in the process.
Connie expressed the
importance of having a chair person on the Selection Committee. Dave commented on the fact that consistency
is a good thing from one project to another and one person from our committee
on the selection committee is good but why not two? One person who was on previous selection
committee and a person who was not previously on a selection committee? Dave
said he would feel more comfortable if someone on the Selection committee had
been through the process before. Someone
mentioned that we should strive to have just one person on the selection team
from our committee. Connie mentioned
that if there was an additional person who had served on a previous selection
committee, that person would not have to necessarily be from the Public Arts
Committee. Gale also mentioned the
importance of having alternates in place.
Angie and Rachel briefly discussed the previous selection committee’s. Connie felt that this conversation is
important enough to wait until more members of the committee are present.
There was discussion on
having a chairperson for the selection committee. Dave thought that a chairperson might not be
necessary while Connie felt a chair is vital to a selection committee to bring
cohesiveness to the group. Connie asked
that 4 specifics regarding selection committee be brought up at the next
meeting: 1. Have not only a Public Art
Committee member on the selection committee but also someone who has served on
a previous selection committee. 2.
alternates 3. back up art 4.
chairperson for selection committee.
Brief discussion on Triangle
Park. A memo from the parks and rec
commission was distributed recommending that the Public Arts Committee research
the MOU between the City and DOT for any restrictions or conflict with
utilities and the existing park use.
Rachel will research and try to locate the MOU.
Gale Parsons spoke about the
artist book. The Homer Animal Shelter
artist’s are supposed to submit their information by April 1. Gale Parsons put together a list of
information that she is requesting from each artist. The committee was given a copy of the list
and Gale welcomes additions to this list.
There was discussion on
different ideas to promote art in the Homer area. Connie expressed her interest in forming a
web page devoted to art. Rachel
mentioned that she could put something on the City web page. Connie thought the web page could include a
map and each site would have its own book about the art and the artists. Dave thought this was a great idea and should
include not just the 1% for the arts program but all the other wonderful art in
Homer as well, including the wall by Nomar and the stained glass eagle at the
Post Office. The Chamber of Commerce
would be a great place to put a link for the art page as well as the Homer
Council on the Arts. Connie thought this
would be a good project to start after the Administrative Guidelines are
complete.
The committee went into
discussion on the author, John Villani coming to town
in July. Rachel is hoping to find out
the correct spelling of the last name and she reserved the council chambers for
the entire day/evening on July 3rd.
Connie mentioned that she had received an email from Asia stating that
the author costs money – somewhere around $250.00. Dave mentioned the Homer Foundation as a
possible funding source. Connie
wondered if the committee could go out and solicit funds. Rachel thought is might not be appropriate
but Connie commented that the Ordinance does have a provision for soliciting
funds. We will have Asia report on the
book tour status at the next meeting.
Connie mentioned the value of a really nice book like a leather
portfolio or if someone actually did a hand made book. This would give the artist’s informational
book an added touch. This would cost
extra money and there was discussion on putting aside some of the 1% for the
arts money so a nice, classy book that introduces the art within the building
could be included.
Rachel reported on project
updates from the Manager’s office: Town
Center, Deep Water Dock, and repaving of roads with bike lanes included. There was discussion on whether these were
appropriate places for art.
There was a brief discussion
on the Safeway mural. The committee has
not yet received a letter from Safeway regarding their desire for a mural. Rachel mentioned that it might be getting
held up due to issues with the front façade and the footprint of the building. Angie mentioned the value of working with a
company that wants to improve their building by either incorporating art or by
other means and how some kind of point system might be worthwhile. For instance, the City could relax one
requirement if the company was willing to go the extra mile in a particular
design standard. Angie felt it was great
that Safeway is taking the initiative to make a more attractive façade and
include art without the community having to ask for it.
Angie requested that we put
committee comments on the agenda for now on.
Next Meeting Date: April 13, 2006