Session 04-14, a
Special Meeting of the Homer Planning Advisory Commission was called to order
at
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS CHESLEY, BARTLETT,
PFEIL, FOSTER, HESS, LEHNER
ABSENT: NONE
STAFF: CITY PLANNER MCKIBBEN
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
JOHNSON
A quorum is required
to conduct a meeting.
All items on the consent agenda are considered routine and non-controversial by the Planning Commission and are approved in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a Planning Commissioner or someone from the public, in which case the item will be moved to the regular agenda and considered in normal sequence.
The agenda was approved by consensus of the Commission.
The public may speak to the Planning Commission regarding matters not on the agenda. The Chair may prescribe time limits. Public comment on agenda items will be heard at the time the item is considered by the Commission. The Planning Director, the Chair, or the Planning Commission approves presentations. A Public Works representative may address the Planning Commission.
A.
Staff Report PL 04-48 Re: Request to
Amend Conditional Use Permit 04-3/Homer Hockey Association for Indoor
Recreational Facilities including Ice-skating Rink, Social and Cultural Events
Located at 3768 Waddell Way, Lot 2, Waddell Park Subdivision.
City Planner McKibben
read the staff report, including staff recommendations. Included with Staff Report PL04-48 was a
letter from Homer Hockey Association President Harold Rasmussen. In addition Memorandum 04-95 from Mayor
Cushing and City Manager Wrede, Re: Ice Rink/Multi-Purpose Facility was
presented.
Harry Rasmussen, resident
and President of the Homer Hockey Association (HHA) told the Commission he did
not like coming back after the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) was already issued. Mr. Rasmussen passed out a brochure from Yeadon on air supported structure domes that provided the
Commission with a visual idea of the facility.
Mr. Rasmussen said a day or so after the Planning Commission meeting (
HHA President
Rasmussen said the group went back to ground level and determined that the
project required implications above ground as well as below. An in-sand refrigeration system could be
placed at five to six ft. underground, preventing the fifteen ft. required for
a concrete system. The Tesoro, a premier ice rink within
Mr. Rasmussen told
the Commission HHA contacted two companies that supply air domes and have had
discussions with the distributors.
Keeping the height at a 35 ft. maximum is the foremost concern,
regardless of the cost. The domes take
approximately ten weeks for delivery and another two weeks to erect. They are available in colors of blue, kelly-green
and white. The advantage is a controlled
environment.
Arctic Winter Games
(AWG) will commence in Homer in March 2006.
A winter exhibition match is required for the HHA to qualify for 30% to
40% of funding for the Arctic games. HHA
intends to continue with the project within the current budget as everyone is
happy with the chosen site. The dome
will require anchors on four corners without extensive excavation.
Mr. Rasmussen said
when the facility is up and running membership will increase, providing funds
for a permanent facility. The air
structure will buy three years time, allowing the grounds, parking lot,
entrances and exits, and the ice rink running.
HHA can focus on a permanent structure knowing that $500,000 to $750,000
is needed for such a facility. Additionally
a three-foot overcharge of gravel for three years will let the area settle to
prevent extensive site digging to place the permanent facility.
Mayor Jack Cushing
said he is an ex-officio member of the Planning Commission, meaning a full
participating member for discussion purposes, although he is not allowed to
vote¨. The Mayor said he believes all the
Commissions are self-sustained, good thinkers and they should get their
information from citizen contact and not pre-determined from Councilmembers input.
On behalf of the City
Council Mayor Cushing relayed that he has invested three weeks of time into the
concept of the AWG in Homer, including attendance at the games at Wood Buffalo
(
Mayor Cushing told
the Commission he understands their concerns of the definition of a temporary
structure and suggested they tackle each issue independently. He said any new business under construction
most likely would be in an unfinished phase for two years. He added that the most important thing for
the Commission’s recommendation was that the structure be owned by the City and
will be removed. The City of
Gary Kulesza, citizen of Homer represents Smokey Bay
Construction. He encourages HHA to have
a facility that could also be utilized in the summer months for
activities. As a builder he believes
that doing things right the first time is important, and said the air structure
will satisfy the need for a shelter only temporarily. Mr. Kulesza
acknowledged that the cost for the full construction plan is very expensive,
and added that plywood and steel supplies along with labor costs will only
increase with time. He encouraged HHA to
find a way to fund a permanent structure the first time. Mr. Kulesza added
that it was worrisome what would happen in three years. He said the City Council meeting could be attended
with crying children when they heard the bubble would come down and they
wouldn’t be able to skate.
Mr. Kulesza said no one will want to landscape a temporary
structure, nor could there be buildings attached to the exterior of the structure
or multi-tenant spaces to generate more income within the structure. Mr. Kulesza said he
has an interest in the structure and represents Eagle Ridge span (a free span
wood building) and Chance helical anchors.
His solution for the building would be anchors or pilings. He said most projects in Homer would not
occur without digging and filling and a compactor could be used to settle the
gravel and then begin building. Mr. Kulesza stated that he was not convinced what the life span
of the bubble was, adding that a wood or steel structure would last
forever. He questioned what the City
would be taking over in three years.
In summary, Mr. Kulesza said he would like to see an architecturally pleasing
and functional center built once. He is
worried about what will happen in three years, and what will be done to the
site? Additionally he questioned where
the money is coming from. If there is no
money for a permanent structure now, where will the money come from after it is
expended on a temporary building? Mr. Kulesza said it is not good money spent in the long run and
suggested the project be put out for design-build, allowing designers and
contractors to bid within the allowed budget.
In closing he asked the Commission to postpone the matter for a week or
two to make a sound decision.
Chair Chesley requested that Commissioner Bartlett declare a conflict
of interest and Commissioner Bartlett declared the conflict on the basis that
his company (Smokey Bay Construction) is in consultation with HHA and has potential
for financial gain. The Commission had
no objection to Commissioner Bartlett declaring a conflict of interest.
Bill Smith, city
resident, said it was not up to the Commission to design buildings although
they can discuss designs. With the sand
floor he questioned what other activities would be played in the summer without
ice. As to the idea of moving the
structure to the Jack Gist Park, Mr. Smith said the Homer Softball Association
people have not been contacted as of yet.
Members that he talked to asked where the building would go, as space is
limited at the park and he is not aware of the City’s plans to purchase
additional land. Mr. Smith said a multi-purpose
building would require four acres to allow for parking and building activities. Mr. Smith added that moving the structure to
the
Tom Bartlett, city
resident, said he wants the hockey arena to materialize as much as any citizen
of the town. He stated he has a conflict
of interest as a Planning Commissioner, the declaration which was just
made. He said the information presented
tonight is only partly known to HHA. Mr.
Bartlett said tonight’s presentation is for a type of building that will be in
place within the time frame needed.
There has been no information on an alternate, nor any figures on the price
for the building Mr. Kulesza and he represent. Mr. Bartlett said the price of the building should
be within their budget range.
Mr. Bartlett said a secondary
problem is with the soils, although he does not have a full analysis. If a point load system would work it would
save hundreds of thousands of dollars due to lack of dirt excavation work. The system proposed by Smokey Bay
Construction could be in the funding range and meet the requirements of the
original Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Mr.
Bartlett said he will be using the helical pier anchors on the Islands and
Oceans Visitors Center and is willing to drive one in the HHA site to see what
the torque refusal is for the system.
There is an alternative for a permanent structure and costs presented tonight
by HHA are not totally known due to other options that have not been
considered.
Mr. Bartlett said the
Fire Marshall told him the dome would have to be built and considered under the
new code system for temporary structures.
A temporary building permit can be issued for up to 180 days with the
ability to offer 90-day extensions after the first 180 days. Additional costs would be assessed for
permits on a temporary building. Mr. Bartlett
said alternatives to the building have not fully been explored, adding that Smokey
Bay Construction could have a permanent structure in place for the Spring
events.
In response to
Commissioner Pfeil’s question of the 12 ft. on center
support systems, Commissioner Bartlett responded that HHA’s
main design were columns on 25 ft. centers.
The proposal from Smokey Bay Construction was for structurally
engineered, pressure treated support beams, at 12.5 ft. main supports. In staying within the 12 to 16 ft. support range
the same loading capacity as steel will be derived at less cost. The majority of weight from roof beams is concentrated
at the bottom of the columns. With weak
soils there is a need for better support and the helical piers are driven down
to determine a torque bearing pounds per square ft. The helical piers will prevent excavation of
ground materials. A soil engineering
analysis or the test of a helical pier is needed to determine the costs for a
permanent building.
Mayor Cushing said
that Mr. Kulesza approached the City Manager and
himself prior to the idea of the air structure.
The Mayor advised him to contact the engineers responsible and present
the helical piers idea to them. The
building may be supported through the helical piers although the area under the
rink needs to be supported with soil surcharge.
Mayor Cushing said with the proposed air structure the rink would be
built on top of the surcharge and after three years would be replaced with
refrigeration coils on the final grade with concrete.
Commissioner Hess
questioned the rink inside on the sand layer and if it would still need to be
replaced in three years. Commissioner
Bartlett said the surcharge is temporary regardless of what type of building
became permanent. HHA wants a 17 ft.
clearance along the inside of the walls for bleachers.
Mayor Cushing said he
visited the Arctic games in
In response to
Commissioner Hess’s question, Mayor Cushing said he recommends the air
structure facility should be owned by the City.
He said it is HHA’s intent that ownership of
the property and ice rink are transferred to the City. In the management agreement letter, details
are outlined for the facility’s operation.
HHA intends to operate the facility for seven months and Parks and
Recreation will operate it for the remaining five months of the year. Project funding will be more inclined to
support substantial backers of the project (the City of
Commissioner Lehner questioned how the City’s considerations for the HHA
property integrate with the
Chair Chesley questioned Mayor Cushing on the soil conditions
that HHA is reporting. The Mayor
responded that there is nothing on the site that would prevent a permanent
structure from being erected. It is HHA
and the City’s preference to have a cement slab to support community events. Soils preparation for a stable surface is needed
for the concrete to prevent shifting and repair work. A sand bed would not require the soil conditioning,
but floor boards would need to be re-leveled for the life of the building. Mayor Cushing said after 10 ft. of excavation
it is cheaper to put pilings in to support a slab. The project can’t afford more than 6 ft. of
excavation. The cheapest way to deal
with the soils for a rink proper would be to let the fill material consolidate,
then remove the surcharge material and replace it with concrete. Chair Chesley said
the soils analysis came in after the CUP was approved requiring a possible Code
amendment. The Mayor said he was asked
to look at the soils analysis report six weeks ago.
Commissioner Lehner questioned if a sand bed is more cost effective for repairs
resulting from multiple uses of the rink.
She stated the Sullivan Arena in
Commissioner Foster
questioned if the City Council wants to spend $800,000 on a temporary structure. Mayor Cushing responded that the dome would
be a permanent structure when placed at
The Commission recessed
at
Gary Kulesza spoke again offering his support of the hockey rink
and reiterated his desire to have the project done correctly the first
time. He said air structures have para doors that go up and down and referred to a hangar in Seldovia. Mr. Kulesza said it is amazing and durable material on the
dome, although not cheap.
Joel Anderson, consultant
to HHA and ice skating rinks was present to answer questions from the
Commission. Commissioner Lehner said whatever structure is chosen, the surcharge
material would be put down and the pipes would be embedded in the sand. Mr. Anderson said the floor design was
discussed and concrete is usually the preferred choice as it is multi-purpose. It is also expensive. With settling or movement a sand floor allows
re-leveling of the refrigeration system annually for a low cost. The expectation is that the floor will sink
rather than rise. HHA already owns a refrigeration
system that can be installed in the sand floor, whereas a concrete system would
require the purchase more materials to fit the design. Mr. Anderson said 40% to 50% of skating rinks
use sand due to the costs. Often they
are open year round. Commissioner Pfeil questioned if the same refrigeration system used in
sand could be used in concrete and Mr. Anderson responded that the concrete
floor requires refrigeration within the perimeter of the rink versus the sand
system needing refrigeration at the ends of the rink. Economically HHA could use the refrigeration
system they currently have for sand and convert it to concrete at a later
date.
Ron Alderfer, city resident, said it is daunting to bring all
the relevant issues together in the construction project where everyone
understands. He said the key points are
the site soil, which is more difficult than anticipated. Early in the project it was assumed that
building up the lower part of the site with surcharge for a workable grade
would be required. The soil removed
would have to be replaced with fill or pilings used to create a good grade. Mr. Alderfer said
it is a complicated factor. The parking
area does not need the same standard as under the footing or concrete, although
it must also fit into the grade. Excavating
for the grade is the high cost. HHA is
waiting for final numbers they can support.
As early as February steel pilings were not an option due to the
availability and costs. Mr. Alderfer said the main problem is the weak soils and rather
than digging them out, the contractor could go down, find strength and transfer
it through steel. It would still require
binding the tops of the pilings together, which is an expensive component in the
system. There is a large amount of earth
to move to make the grade work. HHA has
looked at wood buildings and have learned there are disadvantages due to
interior moisture over time.
Commissioner Hess
questioned if it is possible to put the steel roof structure on the site with
sand under it. Mr. Alderfer
answered that a three-foot surcharge would be needed now. Some soils would need to be excavated and
fill may be needed to replace those soils and the grade raised as high as 9 ft.
in some areas. If that work were
complete sand could be used for the coils.
A steel or wood structure would be much more expensive than the
temporary facility. Grade and bearing is
needed to support the canopy and a forgiving base such as sand. A firm site would be needed for
concrete.
Chair Chesley explained that the rink interior is not a concern
of the Planning Commission, but the outside has building standards. The Commission just spent 41 meetings to
develop building standards and the Community Design Manual (CDM). The Commission is trying to separate the
issues applying to structure. As presented,
the structure is not permissible by code as the structure related to ice
configuration is presented as a package.
De-linking the ice and structure with a modification in the building
plan would provide compliance with building standards.
Chair Chesley said the original CUP met City building
requirements and now with the ice it can no longer comply with building regulations. Mr. Alderfer said
HHA ran into a landslide of costs and there is no way to get enough money for
the proposal due to soil conditions at the site. At this stage HHA can pretend to grab another
two million dollars, give up, or try something affordable. The only affordable option to meet AWG
compliance is the air structure, as Arctic Winter Games will not take anything
less than their standards. HHA has to
put an affordable package together. If
the facility is not accepted the games and hockey are gone.
In response to Chair Chesley’s question if the demonstration events for March
2005 must take place under a covered structure, Mr. Alderfer
said those events do require cover. In
response to Commissioner Hess’s question of the usage of the ground structures
after three years, Mr. Alderfer responded that the
soil used for surcharge could be used on the parking lot. He said the new material brought in to
support the air structure would not be sufficient for a permanent
structure. Mr. Alderfer
said they are looking at using time and weight compared with excavation and
back fill.
City Planner McKibben
said a condition of the permit as approved is that the parking lot be paved and
striped within three years. Mr. Alderfer said the gravel would be moved before the time
expired to meet the paving requirement.
In response to
Commissioner Pfeil’s question if it was HHA’s intent to construct a permanent fixture after the
three years, Mr. Alderfer answered that it was. He added that the cost of the dome is in the
high $300,000’s. That includes the
frame, heating and installation. The
dome and equipment to support it can be used elsewhere. Additionally, the gravel could be used on
site. Mr. Alderfer
said timing is everything right now. Mr.
Pfeil said even if a wood structure costs more it
seems advantageous to take that route.
Chair Chesley remarked that it is a zoning question. The Planning Commission adopted standards for
the Central Business District (CBD) and this proposal is a radical departure
from it. There is no mechanism to enforce
removal of the structure three years from now.
It is the Planning Commission’s job to thoroughly investigate options
and legal requirements to take. Mr. Chesley said as bad as the Commission wants to support
hockey in Homer without a sound finding of fact or code it could be
challenged. Mr. Chesley
compared it to a private hotel developer obtaining an approved CUP and then
running into poor soil conditions. The
developer would then return to the Commission with a proposal for a temporary
hotel which may include Atco trailers clustered
together. Mr. Alderfer
said he understood Mr. Chesley’s pain and frustration
by saying “no”.
Tom Bartlett said
regardless of the building the soil must be excavated and refill added. Inside the building there is 20-ft.
separation between the hockey rink and the ice and the outside of the building
structure. Smokey Bay Construction’s
quote was for the same size building as the main structure, minus the additions
and labor, and less than $300,000. Mr.
Bartlett said a wood building may be a viable option as pressure treated lumber
is used to prevent moisture in buildings.
Scott Adams, city
resident, said his son has been involved in hockey for ten years. He said it would be nice if the facility
worked out, but unfortunately the soil is weak.
Mr. Adams said extra money has to be sought and HHA is doing the leg
work. He said the association is
planning to put up the temporary building, collect more funds and show the
public they are serious. Mr. Adams said
more money is needed for ground work to support the structure needed and the temporary
building will provide more funding. He
said it is a big thing for the City, not just for hockey. Teams spend an average of $5,000 a weekend
when out of town in between hotels and meals.
If the temporary structure does not go up 1.3 million dollars will be
lost. He saw the plans for the library
and the wildlife center and said a pleasing building depends upon each
individual’s tastes.
Harry Rasmussen said
HHA had the groundbreaking ceremony and met with AWG who said the association
would receive $800,000. AWG said an environmental
ground survey was needed. A 1986 report obtained
from HEA was the first indication the project was in big trouble. The most respected dirt people were contacted
and the worse case scenario would be 9 ft. of excavation. They tried to be cautious with real numbers
and figures and took into account a donation of 200 yds.
of gravel from the Kachemak Gun Club. In the second week of May it was discovered
the soils had to be thoroughly investigated so $16,000 was spent for soil
samples. Final reports on the soils are
not complete yet.
Mr. Rasmussen said in
turning the rink over to the City of
HHA President
Rasmussen said the architects have a problem with wood buildings as they have
to tear them down in ten years due to moisture problems. Harry Rasmussen said returning before the
Commission with a request for an air dome has made them a laughing stock of the
community. They are making the request because
it is a solution that works, their children will be skating, and it will be
good for the community.
Commissioner Hess asked
if HHA has thought of a more temporary facility for a four to six month period
for the games. Mr. Rasmussen said of the
$800,000 derived from the AWG, $400,000 will go towards the temporary
building. The Rasmuson
Foundation would like to know that HHA is looking forward to a permanency. If there is no cover on the ice rink there
will be no skating, funding from Rasmuson’s and AWG
would probably be lost, and there would not be a HHA. Mr. Rasmussen said HHA has spent ten years
chasing rainbows and the prospect of a rink is what has kept the association
alive. He said there is not another site
that will work for funding in the given time range. The positives of the present site are great
and to choose a new one would begin the grant funding process all over
again.
Chair Chesley closed the public hearing. He said HHA comes before the Commission and
if a decision doesn’t happen tonight, it will not happen. Chair Chesley noted
the time (
Mayor Cushing said
the questions posed tonight regarding soil samples are beyond the realm of the
Planning Commission. The matter tonight
was for a bubble building request and the Commission’s decision on how the inflatable
structure fits the criteria. He said the
Commission may forget the engineering aspects of the project and allow HHA to
get on with their work.
HESS/PFEIL – MOVED TO
ACCEPT STAFF REPORT PL04-48 WITHOUT STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.
Commissioner Hess
stated that staff recommendation #2 seemed to support that the temporary
building would comply with the CDM.
City Planner McKibben
suggested amending the finding of the staff report on page 11.
Motion failed for lack of a second.
City Planner McKibben
said if Commissioner Hess did not want to adopt the staff recommendations the
findings should be amended. Commissioner
Foster said the proposed facility is just replacing Phase 1 and should still
meet the CDM requirement.
Chair Chesley said it is the HHA, their project manager and
architect’s responsibility to propose an acceptable structure that meets the
design criteria. He said he takes
exception to staff’s analysis, as the CDM addresses structures. HHA has a multi-phase construction plan and
the Commission may not call their air-structure a temporary building. The code could be amended to make a policy in
the Policies and Procedure Manual to adopt the temporary structure to give
something to hang a legal finding on.
The Commission has a fundraising issue that has morphed into a zoning
issue and is being asked to make exception to the code to permit a request for an
individual applicant.
Commissioner Hess
said he is bothered tonight to hear the request from HHA is a fundraising issue
and the code clearly refers to financial reasons for granting exceptions. Commissioner Lehner
said although it is a fundraising issue funds are being raised to benefit the community. She said the fundraising is a means to an end,
as the community can offer something of significance to its residents.
Chair Chesley said a private developer could make the same pitch
for a business to raise tax revenues and it becomes a fundraising issue. The Commission cannot take fundraising issues
into account; it has to be a zoning issue.
Chair Chesley told Mayor Cushing he takes a strong
exception for his chastising the Commission into digging into the details. He said the Commission, as volunteers, need
to understand the issues and without the freedom to ask questions a sound
decision cannot be made. He said there
is a linkage between asking for a structure that doesn’t comply with zoning
requirements, but it is not clear HHA can’t build a facility that does comply
and still meet their needs. The Planning
Commission spent 41 meetings working to adopt building standards and that work
cannot be thrown out the window for a special interest group with an emotionally
charged issue.
Mayor Cushing said he
was not accusing the Commission of asking too much information, but rather felt
they were being told they would be negligent if they did not ask for too
much. The Mayor said the Commission has
to work with whoever approaches the Commission for solutions within the
code. He said the Commission has been
looking at the structure as a permanent one needing to meet all code
requirements. The Mayor said the
Commission needs to trust that HHA has hired firms that are working towards
permanent solutions. He urged the
Commission to allow the HHA to move forward and recognize that the structure
would be temporary. He said HHA has been
very thorough in making their analysis.
Chair Chesley said he volunteers as a Planning Commissioner in a
decision making role. The Commission is
to remain balanced and must give each applicant fair consideration. He said we are all supportive of HHA but
there is no tool to guarantee it is a temporary structure. Chair Chesley said
he would like more support from staff and the City Attorney.
Mayor Cushing
questioned if the Commission may scuff the project and Chair Chesley answered that HHA has the permit in place to build
a structure. Part of that permit is to
do the site work and the Planning Commission assumes the project will move
along. The City Planner will have the
responsibility of checking in and monitoring their permit for compliance. In the interim the Commission can work on the
request for the temporary structure. HHA
has a permit to start and do excavation.
The Planning Commission’s concern is a structure that is not in
compliance. Modifying the Policies and
Procedures Manual may be the tool needed, rather than an ordinance that would
require a public hearing and City Council approval. Assuring that the structure is temporary will
give staff the authority to make sure the structure comes down.
In response to Chair Chesley’s question of who would be the Mayor to take the
temporary structure down after three years, Mayor Cushing answered that most elected
officials would be afraid not to knock it down after three years. He said it would be the role of elected
officials to assure the temporary building came down. Russell Cooper said the City is investing
$3,000 for water and sewer services, HEA is putting in electricity and HHA pays
for the rest.
City Planner McKibben
said the issue is how the CDM addresses temporary structures and its definition
in the context of the CDM. The CDM is a
policy that was adopted by resolution by the City Council. The Planning Commission can make a
recommendation to the City Council to amend the resolution.
Tom Bartlett said he
and Gary Kulesza have HHA at heart and if it makes
the Commission’s job simpler to disregard his previous testimony, they are willing
to withdraw their cost proposal and are no longer involved in decision
making. Chair Chesley
said he did not believe the Commission could do that in one meeting and
suggested a special meeting be set for July 14th to continue the CUP
process.
FOSTER/LEHNER – MOVED THAT THE HOMER HOCKEY ASSOCIATION CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND STAFF REPORT 04-48 BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF
VOTE: YES. NON OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
The pending motion to accept
Staff Report PL04-48 without staff recommendations was continued to the July
14, 2004 meeting.
COMMENTS OF THE
AUDIENCE
None.
Members of the audience may address the Commission on any subject. The Chair may prescribe time limits.
COMMENTS OF THE
COMMISSION
Commissioners may comment on any subject, including requests to staff and requests for excused absence.
Commissioner Chesley said the
Planning Commission is supportive of HHA in their hamlet by the sea. He said in chasing rainbows there is a pot of
gold donation for HHA from the Planning Commission for their support that HHA’s vision becomes reality. Chair Chesley
presented HHA President Rasmussen with a card and contribution.
Mayor Cushing thanked the Commissioner’s for their work and
said it would be remembered for many years.
He additionally thanked the Commission for asking the hard questions and
being troopers on this one.
ADJOURN
Notice of the next
regular or special meeting or worksession will appear
on the agenda following “adjournment”.
There being no further business
to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at
_____________________________
JO JOHNSON, DEPUTY
CITY CLERK
Approved:____________________