Session 06-05, a Regular Meeting of the Homer Advisory Planning Commission was called to order by Chair Chesley at 7:09 p.m. on February 15, 2006 at the City Hall Cowles Council Chambers located at 491 E. Pioneer Avenue, Homer, Alaska.

 

PRESENT:         COMMISSIONERS:         CHESLEY, CONNOR, FOSTER, HESS, KRANICH, LEHNER,                                                                     PFEIL

 

STAFF: CITY PLANNER MCKIBBEN

                        DEPUTY CITY CLERK JOHNSON                      

 

A quorum is required to conduct a meeting.

 

APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA        

 

All items on the consent agenda are considered routine and non-controversial by the Planning Commission and are approved in one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a Planning Commissioner or someone from the public, in which case the item will be moved to the regular agenda and considered in normal sequence.

 

          A.       Time Extension Requests

B.                Approval of City of Homer Projects under HCC 1.76.030 g.

          C.       KPB Coastal Management Program Reports

D.                  Commissioner Excused Absences

 

HESS/PFEIL – MOVED TO AMEND THE AGENDA TO ADD COMMISSION BUSINESS ITEM G – COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE.

 

VOTE:  YES.  NON OBJECTION.  UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

 

Motion carried.

 

The amended agenda was approved by consensus of the Commission.

 

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

 

Commission approves minutes with any amendments.

 

A.                  Approval of the February 1, 2006 regular meeting minutes.

 

The amended minutes were approved by consensus of the Commission.

 

PUBLIC COMMENT, PRESENTATIONS

 

The public may speak to the Planning Commission regarding matters not on the agenda.  The Chair may prescribe time limits.  Public comment on agenda items will be heard at the time the item is considered by the Commission.  Presentations are approved by the Planning Director, the Chair, or the Planning Commission.  A Public Works representative may address the Planning Commission.

 

There were no public comments.

 

PUBLIC HEARINGS

 

The Commission conducts Public Hearings by hearing a staff report, hearing public testimony and then acting on the Public Hearing items.  The Chair may prescribe time limits.  The Commission may question the public.

 

A.                  Staff Report PL 06-14, CUP 06-03 Amended Conditional Use Permit/05-09 Adair, A Fisherman’s Resort, Planned Unit Development, as permitted by Homer City Code (HCC) 21.49.030 (f) located at 1302 Ocean Drive, Lots 29, 30, 56 and 57, Bayview Subdivision.

 

City Planner McKibben summarized the staff report.  A letter dated February 15, 2006 by Donna and Kevin Maltz was acknowledged as laydown information.  The last two recommendations of Staff report PL 06-14 were renumbered as 11 and 12.

 

Commissioner Hess asked about the DOT (Department of Transportation) beautification permit and City Planner McKibben explained it was for landscaping within the right-of-way (ROW). 

 

Commissioner Foster inquired about the smoking facility within the fish processing area.  He asked if the facility had always been in the plan and commented that a fish smoking facility may not be permitted in that zoning district.  City Planner McKibben explained the GC1 district has performance standards that address emissions.  A commercial smoker would be overseen by DEC (Department of Environmental Conservation) permits that have strict emission standards.

 

Ed Adair, owner of the project, appeared before the Commission.  He said the weather is so nice in Homer he wonders why he went back to Hawaii.  He provided an elevation drawing facing north from Douglas Place of the proposed development.  Mr. Adair said he requested the amendment after the Maltz’s called him and asked that he reconsider the plans as they didn’t like the lodge buildings so close to their restaurant.  On November 9, 2005 when the development was approved one commissioner commented that the plan may not be best one and would like to see if there was a better plan.  Mr. Adair worked with staff and came up with this plan that uses less footprint space to free up parking, greenspace, the dumpsters, and loading zones; all questions that arose at the previous meetings.  As a tradeoff, the lodging unit was put on the third floor.  The tradeoff is that the building is not located in a convenient place to use as an office to check in for the RV’s entering the development.  Mr. Adair selected an RV space that suited the traffic flow for an RV check-in area, to divert them from Douglas Place and provide as much room as possible in case more than one RV arrived at the same time.  The manager’s residence footprint is 500 sq. ft. with the bedroom loft above.  It backs up to a new building being built by the neighbor behind the development, and Mr. Adair selected the spot to camouflage the area.

 

As to smoking fish, Mr. Adair said it has always been in the plan.  The facility will be set up for red salmon and possibly a few king salmon.  Totes of fish already filleted from charter boats will arrive at the facility and will slide through the door for processing.  There will not be an outside cleaning area or dumpsters used for fish processing.  The fish processing facility will be first class and licensed.  Mr. Adair said he wouldn’t put a restaurant and lodge above the facility if it were to have any odor.  He does not want any negativity for the neighbors.  Fifty percent of the processed fish will be shipped Federal Express and the other 50% will be put in coolers or boxes for guests to take on the plane or carry in their RV.  He tried to keep the building small, yet wanted to provide for adequate storage.  There are five doors with numbers on the third floor; one is a utility room with maid’s facilities, the four others are for lodging.  The fish smoker will be vented from the first floor with the kitchen vents on the second floor and up through the roof.  The smoker is a forced air unit with a combination of heat, dehydration and smoking.  A batch of fish can be turned out in about four hours; two of those spent smoking it.  Mr. Adair doubts anyone would notice any more odor than that from alder wood in a fireplace or stove emitting from a residence.  The main building will be built on half of an acre of land and its footprint will be the approximate size of a 2,600 sq. ft. residence with a two-car garage.   

 

Commissioner Foster told Mr. Adair he appreciates that he brought the plans back, as he didn’t need to, especially from Hawaii.  He asked if there was any provision for the slight bit of fish skin and its disposal.  Mr. Adair answered he will have a regular dumpster for people in the RV park and the restaurant.  Garbage from the fish processing will be placed in garbage bags and stored inside the facility until disposed of.  At the end of each day the entire facility will be sanitized by a process approved by the Fisheries Commission.

 

Mr. Adair asked for clarification on the 8 ft. zone on the side of the property that says “Do Not Disturb”.  The Maltz’s asked him if additional landscape could be planted in the area.  Stumps infringe into the area beyond the 8 ft. zone and two trees are dying.  He asked the Commission how he could enhance and maintain the area. 

 

LEHNER/HESS – MOVED TO GRANT CUP 06-03 AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS AND FINDINGS.

 

On November 9, 2005 the Planning Commission approved CUP 05-09 with the following conditions. 

 

1.   The applicant will meet the requirements in HCC 21.49.060 (h) for landscaped buffers of 3 feet minimum width along all lot lines where setbacks permit.

2.   The applicant must begin the project within one year to comply with 21.61.060 (g).

3.   The applicant must submit a parking plan with a zoning permit application that meets the requirements of HCC 7.12.

4.   Any permanent structures, including power pedestals, are set back 20 feet from the right-of-way of Douglas Place and Lakeshore Drive.

5.   Drainage shall be developed as shown on the revised site plan.

6.   Per HCC 21.49.060(a) no disturbance shall occur within 8 feet of the eastern lot line or within the drip line of trees on the adjacent lot to prevent root damage, furthermore per HCC 21.61.060(f)(5) to ensure privacy of adjacent property.

  1. The project will meet all other applicable local, state and federal requirements.
  2. Vehicles may not impede traffic movement on adjacent rights-of-way in accordance with HCC 7.12.030(c). 

RECOMMENDATION

 

Staff recommends Planning Commission approval of the amendment with the previously approved conditions and the addition of the following conditions:

 

Prior to construction:

  1.  Fire Marshal Plan Approval. 
  2.  Architect or engineered drawing showing height calculations that meet HCC         21.32.085 and HCC 21.49.040 (c).

11. If permitted through a DOT Beautification permit, the applicant will improve landscaping in the ROW along Ocean Drive by 7/1/07.

12. Eliminate parking spaces #16 as shown on RA-1 site plan, to provide an adequate loading area. HCC 7.12.120.

 

Chair Chesley called for a recess at 7:49 p.m. and resumed the meeting at 7:54 p.m.

 

HESS/KRANICH - MOVED TO AMEND CONDITION #6 TO READ: PER HCC 21.49.060(A), EXCEPT AS NECESSARY FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING OR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE NO DISTURBANCE SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 8 FEET OF THE EASTERN LOT LINE OR WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF TREES ON THE ADJACENT LOT TO PREVENT ROOT DAMAGE, FURTHERMORE PER HCC 21.61.060(F)(5) TO ENSURE PRIVACY OF ADJACENT PROPERTY.

 

Commissioner Hess explained the intent was to allow additional landscaping in the area.

 

Commissioner Connor asked how maintenance would be defined.  Would it include cutting down a tree that you thought was dying?  City Planner McKibben said to maintain the existing natural vegetation it makes sense to remove a dead or dying tree.  It is not unreasonable to require that an outside resource such as an expert arborist or forester make a determination of the tree’s health before it is removed.  City Planner McKibben said the additional language would be helpful to make the recommendation totally clear. 

 

VOTE:  YES.  PFEIL, CONNOR, HESS, KRANICH, FOSTER, CHESLEY, LEHNER

 

Motion carried.

 

LEHNER/PFEIL – MOVED TO INSERT CONDITION AFTER #6, RESULTING IN THE RENUMBERING OF ALL FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, THE NEW CONDITION TO READ: NO DEAD OR DYING TREE WILL BE REMOVED UNTIL AN ARBORIST OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ACCEPTED BY THE CITY DETERMINES THE TREE CANNOT BE SAVED.

 

VOTE:  YES.  CONNOR, LEHNER, KRANICH, HESS, CHESLEY, FOSTER, PFEIL

 

Motion carried.

 

Commissioner Foster noted there were 36 parking spaces in the report and 37 shown on the diagram.  City Planner McKibben said parking space #16 was eliminated to allow for an adequate loading area. 

 

Commissioner Connor thanked Mr. Adair for taking the time and energy to revise the plans.  She said it was a much better plan and working with the neighbors means a lot.  Ms. Connor said it appears the open space requirement has been satisfied.  She said it would be nice to have something in the staff report reflecting the Commission’s discussions about open space, allowing the public to get a clear picture.  Chair Chesley suggested Commissioner Connor make a motion for a 14th condition that the development comply with the open space calculation requirement.  She asked if the three-foot buffer zone finding should be added. 

Chair Chesley called for a recess at 8:06 p.m. and resumed the meeting at 8:10 p.m.

 

CONNOR/KRANICH – MOVED TO ADD RECOMMENDATION #14 :  THE THREE FEET OF THE VEGETATED “DO NOT DISTURB” ZONE ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE LOT AND THE LANDSCAPED AREAS ON THE SITE PLAN RA-1 WILL COUNT TOWARDS THE MINIMUM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RV PARK.

 

Commissioner Kranich questioned if it was an open space requirement for the RV park or the entire development.  Chair Chesley answered it was for the RV park.  City Planner McKibben said there are no open space requirements for any of the other uses occurring on the site.

 

VOTE:  YES.  LEHNER, HESS, FOSTER, CHESLEY, CONNOR, PFEIL, KRANICH

 

Motion carried.

 

Commissioner Connor pointed out the 8 ft. open space is really an 8 ft. buffer with a 3 ft. open space, as referred on the staff report.  City Planner McKibben said the previous condition approved makes it clear.

 

Commissioner Kranich stated the following corrections to the staff report:

 

Page 15 – places the four the lodge units

Page 19 – that’s that a planned unit

Page 21 – (D finding) developer intends to use city the on-site water and sewer lines.

Page 22 – vegetated buffer, on the east property line.

 

He asked about Public Works comments that the approach to the dumpster does not meet standards.  City Planner McKibben clarified the removal of parking space 16 increases the loading area and the applicants plan to roll the dumpster out for trash collection. 

 

Commissioner Foster referenced the Maltz’s letter and their concern that parking is not adequate for RV’s, fish processing deliveries and restaurant patrons.  City Planner McKibben explained there are 42 seats dedicated for the restaurant, with a requirement of 14 parking spaces.  The RV park requires an RV space and one additional space for each RV.  There is one space required for guest parking and the manager’s space.  Each lodge unit has a parking space.  Mr. Adair’s parking plan has 36 spaces, which exceeds the required 35 spaces per the current code.

 

Commissioner Connor questioned PUD requirements cited in the staff report as it doesn’t address requirements for an RV park.  City Planner McKibben answered the RV park was not addressed as it was approved by the previous CUP and there was no need to reevaluate.

 

VOTE:  (main motion) YES. CHESLEY, PFEIL, CONNOR, LEHNER, KRANICH, HESS, FOSTER

 

Motion carried.

 

PLAT CONSIDERATION

 

The Commission hears a report from staff, testimony from applicants and the public.  The Commission may ask questions of staff, applicants and the public. 

None.

 

Chair Chesley called for a recess at 8:25 p.m. and resumed the meeting at 8:27 p.m.

 

COMMISSION BUSINESS

 

The Commission hears a report from staff, testimony from applicants and the public.  Commission business includes resolutions, ordinances, zoning issues, requests for reconsideration and other issues as needed.  The Commission may ask questions of staff, applicants, and the public.

 

A.                  Staff Report PL 06-02 Request For Re-Zone From Urban Residential to Residential Office for a portion of Lots 1, 37-A, And 12-A in A. A. Mattox Subdivision.

 

City Planner McKibben explained the public hearing was held on January 18, 2006 and there was a motion to postpone at the request of the applicant.

 

Pastor Rick Wise appeared before the Commission to answer any questions.  When asked if he had talked to the neighbors, he responded there have been no negative comments.  People have just asked him if he plans on building.  Commissioner Kranich commented there were people that live on Kramer Lane that attended the January 18, 2006 meeting.

 

PFEIL/LEHNER - MOVED TO ACCEPT STAFF REPORT PL 06-02 WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.

City Planner McKibben stated that two of the lots are replatted resulting in half of each lot in the Urban Residential (UR) and the other half in the Residential Office (RO) district.  The third lot is currently zoned UR and was not part of the replat.

 

Commissioner Foster supports the rezoning.  He asked City Planner McKibben what would stop applicants from purchasing property and leap frogging (buying property just outside the CBD with a connection inside the CBD and just outside of it and moving it again and again).  Ms. McKibben said there would be nothing to stop that type of action; each case needs individual evaluation.  She said the Comprehensive Plan talks about infilling residential districts but does not speak to expanding within the CBD.  Chair Chesley said that is why he and Commissioner Kranich took on rewriting how to create a zoning map amendment.  He said more discussion is needed as to the provisions.       

 

Commissioner Hess referenced the Policies and Procedure Manual that states the Commission will use the following standards when reviewing a zoning amendment:

·         the public need in justification for the proposed change

·         effect on public health, safety and welfare

·         effect of the change on the district and surrounding property

·         relationship to the Comprehensive Plan and purposes of the zoning regulation

 

City Planner McKibben responded the staff report is based on previous rezoning requirements and does not address all of the standards.  When asked if he felt the staff report was insufficient, Commissioner Hess answered the UR district allows churches as conditional use.  He asked what public need and justification is there for a rezone?  City Planner McKibben did not offer a public need.

 

HCC 21.70.010 was read by City Planner McKibben.  She said the recent staff report for William Marley’s proposed rezone addressed the standards clearly, but the subject staff report does not address the review standards.  It was decided the staff report would be revised to add the review standards.

 

Pastor Rick Wise stated they have owned two of the lots since the 1950’s, the third lot was purchased in 1982 and the final one in the early 1990’s.  The zoning districts went right through the middle of two lots as they were separate pieces.  

 

HESS/LEHNER – MOVED TO CONTINUE TO ASK CITY PLANNER MCKIBBEN TO PROBE FURTHER IN REVIEW STANDARDS IN THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL.[1]

 

Commissioner Foster said the church congregation would be part of the public also.

 

VOTE:  YES. FOSTER, CONNNOR, PFEIL, CHESLEY, LEHNER, KRANICH, HESS

 

Motion carried.

 

Pastor Rick Wise said as divided as the property is it would be better to have consistent zoning.

 

B.                  Memorandum requesting support for House Bill 415a, “An Act relating to landowners’ immunity for allowing use of land for a recreational activity….”

 

Commissioner Hess said Representative Paul Seaton’s office has been working to clarify the Alaska State Statutes regarding private landowner’s liability in recreational use.  A House Bill has been introduced and letters of support are needed by Representative Seaton.

 

The Commission discussed the proposed House Bill and the positive ramifications of its passage.  The Bill would create more difficulty in suing a landowner for negligence.  It was the general consensus of the Commission that they support the House Bill. 

 

LEHNER/CONNOR – MOVED TO SEND TO CITY COUNCIL A STRONG RECOMMENDATION OF SUPPORT FOR HOUSE BILL 415.

 

VOTE:  YES.  NON OBJECTION.  UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

 

Motion carried.

 

C.                  Staff Report PL 06-13 Re:  Proposed Amendment to HCC 21.45.040 (b) Dimensional Requirements (b) Building Setbacks (1).

The Commission discussed the laydown Resolution 06-(blank).  It is a companion resolution to Ordinance 05-(blank) to define undeveloped ROW’s in RR and UR zoning districts that access Kachemak Bay.  City Planner McKibben asked the Commission to review the ROW’s and decide which ones were unsuitable for road construction.  Additionally it was suggested another public hearing be scheduled due to the lapse of time on the subject.  The Commission decided the following ROW’s were unsuitable for road construction:

 

·         Leber St. South of Orca Way

·         Crittenden Drive South of Hidden Way

·         Victoria Place

·         Parson Lane from the Southernmost section of Ocean Drive Loop

·         Lake Street South of the Southernmost section of Ocean Drive

·         B Street South of Bay Avenue

·         Morris Ave. East of Kachemak Drive

·         Campbell Lane East of Kachemak Drive

 

The Commission made changes to both the draft ordinance and resolution.

 

Granting setback relief by preserving the ROW’s will benefit both health and welfare.  The only option before was to vacate ROW’s.   

 

LEHNER/KRANICH - MOVED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 1 OR MARCH 15, 2006.

 

VOTE:  YES.  NON OBJECTION.  UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

 

Motion carried.

 

            D.         Ordinance 06-05 Of the City Council of the City of Homer, Alaska Amending     Homer City Zoning Map to Rezone to Central Business District (CBD), Portions of Rural    Residential (RR) and Portions of Urban Residential (UR) Zoning Districts fronting on      the Sterling Highway West Hill Area to the South West Boundary of the Central             Business District (CBD), and to Rezone to Central Business District (CBD) Portions of            Rural Residential (RR), Urban Residential (UR) and Residential Office (RO) Zoning           Districts fronting East End Road in the East Hill Area.

 

Ordinance 06-05 was not discussed.[2] 

 

            E.         Staff Report PL 05-82   Re:       Lot sizes within the Rural Residential Zoning    District.  CONTINUED.

 

HESS/PFEIL – MOVED TO MOVE ITEM E FROM THE AGENDA TO THE WORK LIST.

 

VOTE:  YES.  NON OBJECTION.  UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

 

Motion carried.

 

F.      Staff Report PL 06-06 Re:  Commission Work List, On-going.

Chair Chesley said before the Fred Meyer permit application comes in it would be beneficial for the Commission to have a couple of Worksessions to go through the Design Criteria Manual.  It would be good for the current body of Commissioners to have a discussion on it.  City Planner McKibben said it may be useful to review the not yet adopted Town Center Development plan along with it, as Fred Meyer is trying to meet the intent of it.

 

G.     Comprehensive Plan – Planning Commissioner Representative

 

Commissioner Lehner would like to be considered as the Commission’s liaison for the Comprehensive Plan rewrite.  There were no objections from the Commission.

 

REPORTS

 

A.                  Borough Report

 

Commissioner Foster reported there was a presentation of the draft for the new enforceable policies for the coastal program for the KPB.  While the State is taking on what are currently the KPB’s enforceable policies, there are a couple of areas where the KPB is taking lead.  One of those is identifying recreational uses and to have enforceable policies to protect the recreational uses in streams and the shoreline.  The KPB has identified the west side of the peninsula as an erosion zone and the city’s project of shoreline change as a scientific study that identifies the areas as erosion zones.  It allows enforceable policies and the rest of Borough can follow the same process.  The State will then review the enforceable policies.  It will be a good method of identifying special protection areas.

 

The gravel ordinance is moving along, as members of the KPB Assembly and the KPB Planning Commission are coming to terms with it.  Commissioner Foster is pleased with the move toward identifying the need to protect private operators and homeowners’ rights as well as the water table environment.

 

Commissioner Foster said a question before the KPB attorney was if a commissioner has voted on an application as a member of the city planning and zoning process, should they recuse themselves from voting on the same quasi-judicial application when it is before the KPB Planning Commission?  The KPB attorney concluded if the commissioner voted at city level and declared on the record that his or her mind is still open, the commissioner’s role in the KPB process could be challenged for bias.  To avoid the appearance of bias it is recommended that the commissioners recuse themselves from the discussion and decision of petitions before the Planning Commission or Plat Committee where they have participated in the decision making process regarding the same application at the city planning and zoning level.

 

The Commission discussed the KPB attorney ruling that was submitted as a laydown.  Commission Foster said his belief was that he would represent the city’s decision at the KPB level, whether or not he supported it at the vote.  Commissioner Hess suggested the ruling may merit further response.

 

HESS/LEHNER - MOVED THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ATTORNEY OPINION REGARDING DIQUALIFICATION FOR BIAS OF PLANNING COMMISSIONER BE BROUGHT TO THE CITY MANAGER FOR FURTHER REVIEW.

 

VOTE:  YES.  NON OBJECTION.  UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

 

Motion carried.

 

B.         Kachemak Bay Advisory Planning Commission Report

 

None.

 

PLANNING DIRECTOR’S REPORT

 

City Planner McKibben discussed travel arrangements with the Commission for the upcoming training in Anchorage.  

 

INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS

 

Items listed under this agenda item can be HCC meeting minutes, copies of zoning violation letters, reports and information from other government units.

 

A.      Draft Resolution 06-19, A Resolution of the City Council Directing Planning Staff to Write an Ordinance Creating a New Zoning District Defining Commercial and Residential use Along the Sterling Highway from the Baycrest Hill City Limits to the Bidarka Inn, to be Henceforth Called the Gateway Zoning District.

 

City Planner McKibben provided a signed copy of Resolution 06-19 as a laydown.  The Planning Department is working on scheduling a public meeting with property owners.  Commissioner Hess said he emailed City Planner McKibben requesting a consultant to help with the ordinance.  City Planner McKibben said it was important to start with the property owners, as their thoughts were needed before the ordinance was drafted.  She said there may not be enough time to hire a consultant, as the RFP process takes time.

 

Commissioner Foster said there is confusion on the wetlands from the City Council, even though Dave Casey was here from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers.  City Planner McKibben said the ordinance the Commission reviewed in January to remove the requirement to show the Corps of Engineers permit prior to the issuance of a zoning permit was tabled.  Dave Casey gave a 30-minute presentation at the Council Worksession on the general permit.  City Planner McKibben and Planning Technician Engebretsen researched and could not find an official policy decision by Council as to why we would have the general permit.  The Planning Department has issued only a few low value fill permits, with anything else being referred to the Corps. 

 

With the EPA grant there has been new mapping.  There is a working group identifying the scientific functions of the different wetlands identified.  The wetlands have doubled from 1,500 acres to 3,000 acres with the new mapping done last year.  The Council seemed confused with the discussion of the general permit and the discussion of the code change.  Staff is not in support of the proposed amendment that a developer could come to the Planning Department to get a zoning permit without having to show proof of a Corps permit.  The applicant would be strongly advised they may need to get a Corps permit.  She said the language in the code may need to be clarified.  Applications of pending permits could be shown to the Planning Department and proof of permits could be submitted to the department upon completion.  It was suggested other communities be contacted to see their policies.        

 

              B.  Information regarding Planning Commission training by the Alaska Chapter of the                  American Planning Association.  

 

This was discussed under PLANNING DIRECTOR’S REPORT. 

 

COMMENTS OF THE AUDIENCE

 

Members of the audience may address the Commission on any subject.  The Chair may prescribe time limits.

 

There was no audience.

 

COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION

 

Commissioners may comment on any subject, including requests to staff and requests for excused absence.

 

Commissioner Pfeil would like to be excused from the March 15th meeting.

 

Commissioner Connor said the Cook Inlet Alliance is co-sponsoring a shipping safety event on February 27th   from 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. at Islands and Ocean Visitors Center.  It is a timely discussion after the recent grounding.

 

Chair Chesley reminded the Commissioners there is a Land Allocation planning session with the City Council at 4:00 p.m. on February 27th.

 

Commission Hess shared a quote: “The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject.”

 

Commissioner Lehner said she was disappointed to miss the Joint Worksession, but will look for the audio online.

 

Commissioner Kranich said the opening of the Pratt Museum exhibit of developing the community and making a place for ourselves was last Tuesday.  There was fair attendance during the week and Saturday afternoon after the Winter Carnival parade over 300 people went through the exhibit.  It was so crowded you could hardly move through the gallery.  The exhibit will be upstairs at the museum through March and will then be moved downstairs.  There are over 300 pictures with original documents from the 1930’s and 1940’s.  Saturday and Sunday Brantley Edens had a video showing early skiing in Homer.  Commissioner Kranich said he read with great interest the email from Commissioner Hess about Anchorage going through a Title 21 rewrite.  He said the Council may not have a clue as to how long a total rewrite of Title 21 could or should take.  If consultants are involved over a period of time it is substantial dollars.  Commissioner Kranich said it was a good meeting tonight.  Commissioner Hess said there was an article about the Anchorage sign ordinance also.

 

Commissioner Foster said he will miss the meeting with the City Council on February 27th due to a Borough Planning Commission and Plat Committee meeting that evening.  He reminded everyone to put April 6th on their calendar for the road science and policy workshop at Islands and Ocean Visitor’s Center.  There will be a lot of good information about hydrology and engineering.  It will be the best folks working in interface of roads and environment.  Commissioner Foster thanked the Planning Department for the hard work they are doing and working this week without a full staff.  He appreciates that two Planning Department staff members and one Public Works employee have been at the GIS training that the Coastal Training Program and coastal services from NOAA are providing. 

 

Chair Chesley said it was a great meeting and he thanked Deputy City Clerk Johnson.

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

Notice of the next regular or special meeting or work session will appear on the agenda following “adjournment.”

 

There being no further business to come before the Commission the meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m.  The next Regular Meeting is scheduled for March 1, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Cowles Council Chambers with a Worksession at 6:00 p.m. prior to the meeting.

 

 

___________________________________

JO JOHNSON, DEPUTY CITY CLERK

 

Approved:_________________________



[1] The Commission clarified the motion’s intent was to continue Staff Report PL06-02 in order for City Planner McKibben to further review standards in the Policies and Procedures Manual.

[2] Ordinance 06-05 failed at introduction on February 13, 2006 by the Homer City Council.