Session 08-13, a Regular Meeting of the Homer
Advisory Planning Commission was called to order by Chair Kranich at 7:00 p.m.
on
PRESENT: COMMISSIONER
HESS, KRANICH, MINSCH, STORM, ZAK
ABSENT: COMMISSIONER
FOSTER (Excused)
STAFF:
DEPUTY
AGENDA
APPROVAL
The agenda was approved by consensus of the
Commission.
PUBLIC
COMMENT
The Public may speak to the Planning Commission
regarding matters not scheduled for public hearing. (3 minute time limit)
Presentations approved by the Planning Director, the Chair or the Planning
Commission. A Public Works representative may address the Planning Commission.
There were no public comments.
RECONSIDERATION
STORM/HESS MOVED TO RECONSIDER STAFF REPORT 08-72.
Commissioner Minsch commented that she requested
reconsideration for two reasons. One reason was to establish findings for the
denial of the CUP at the last meeting. The other is because the packet they
were working from at the last meeting did not include the entire TIA. Her
particular vote was based on the executive summary of the TIA, which was only
in the original packet. During discussion, she had the packet from the previous
meeting and she doesn’t know that the other Commissioners had the same
information.
VOTE: YES: MINSCH, STORM, ZAK, KRANICH, HESS
Motion carried.
ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
All items on the consent agenda are considered
routine and non-controversial by the Planning Commission and are approved in
one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless
requested by a Planning Commissioner or someone from the Public, in which case
the item will be moved to the regular agenda and considered in normal sequence.
1. Approval of the Minutes of
2. Time
Extension Requests
a. Tulin Terrace Subdivision East Terrace
Addition, KPB File 2005-123
3. Approval
of City of
4. KPB
Coastal Management Program
5. Commissioner
Excused Absences
Commissioner Zak requested the time extension for
Tulin Terrace be put under New Business.
MINSCH/STORM MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS
AMENDED.
There was no discussion.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT
Motion carried.
PRESENTATIONS
Presentations approved by the Planning Director,
the Chair, or the Planning Commission. A Public Works representative may
address the Planning Commission.
There were no presentations scheduled.
REPORTS
A. Borough
Report
There was no Borough Report
B.
There was no KBAPC report.
C. Planning
Director’s Report
PUBLIC
HEARINGS
The Commission conducts Public Hearings by hearing
a staff report, hearing public testimony and the acting on the Public Hearing
items. (3 minute time limit) The commission may question the public. Once the
public hearing is closed the Commission cannot hear additional comments on the
topic.
Chair Kranich opened the public hearing.
There were no public comments.
Chair Kranich closed the public hearing.
MINSCH/ZAK MOVED TO ADOPT PL 08-73 TITLE 21
TECHNICAL REWRITE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.
It was noted that in the re-write there is a
section that talks about the Comprehensive Plan and lists each document and the
year it was adopted. City Attorney Tans recommended that the plans which have
not been adopted, like the Non Motorized Transportation and Trails Plan and the
Water Sewer Master Plan, should not be included in the technical re-write.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
PLAT
CONSIDERATION
The Commission hears a staff report, testimony from
applicants and the public, The Commission may ask questions of staff,
applicants and the public, The Commission will accept testimony or a
presentation on agenda items that involve an applicant.
Jim Henkelman, property owner, explained that his
plan is to subdivide into two lots, sell the larger lot and build a smaller
house for himself on the vacant lot.
Roger Imhoff, project surveyor, commented regarding
the recommendation for an easement to be created across lot 8A to provide
access to lot 8B and placed on the plat. Mr. Imhoff said if the Commission decides
an easement is appropriate, it is preferred that it be provided on a separate
easement document. He explained it is so much easier to alter in the future. If
it is on the plat then they have to go through the entire platting process
again to modify, change, or relinquish it.
MINSCH/HESS MOVED TO ADOPT
Staff
Comments/Recommendations:
Planning
Commission recommend approval of the preliminary plat with the following
comments:
1. Lots should be reconfigured so that access to
lot 8B is directly from the cul-de-sac.
2. Meet
Public Works recommendations 1-4.
Public Works recommendations:
1. Dedicate remaining half of
2. Show 15 foot wide utility
easement around the new cul-de-sac dedication.
3. Remove the word “underground”
from plat note 5
4. An easement needs to be created across lot 8A to provide
access to lot 8B. Recommend this easement be placed on the plat rather than
using a separate easement document. This easement should also allow for the
extension of utility services (water, sewer) to lot 8B from the cul-de-sac,
when available in the future. No easement would be required if lot 8B was
platted as a flag lot (extending over the cul-de-sac).
5. The City does not maintain roads serving these two parcels
or provide water and sewer service. The owners of these two lots may be
required in the future to construct road improvements within the rights-of-way
fronting the properties at their own cost.
Question was raised regarding Public Works note 5.
There was brief discussion regarding the utility
easement. It was noted that there is a 10 foot utility easement along the
southern property line. Typically the City recommends 15 foot easements. It is
hard to guess what future water and sewer easements might be needed. They do
have access to utility easements and meet the Borough Code requirements for
subdividing.
Point was raised that there is conflict with Staff
Recommendation 1 and the Public Works recommendation that there be an easement.
Acting City Planner Engebretsen noted that dedicating an access easement instead
of reconfiguring the lot would be acceptable to staff.
HESS/STORM MOVED TO ELIMINATE STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1.
There was brief discussion regarding another
amendment.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
STORM/ZAK MOVED TO AMEND STAFF RECOMMENDATION 2 TO
READ MEET PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION 1-3
There was discussion to clarify that recommendation
four is eliminated and a new recommendation is to allow the access easement be
on a separate easement document.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Chair Kranich noted that item 12 on page 3 of the
staff report states that no rights-of-way are to be dedicated by this action,
but it should state that a half cul-de-sac dedication is being completed by
this action.
VOTE (Main motion as amended): YES: MINSCH, ZAK,
KRANICH, HESS, STORM
Motion carried.
PENDING
BUSINESS
Pending Main Motion
as amended:
TO ADOPT STAFF
REPORT PL 08-65 CONDITION USE PERMIT 07-12 FOR LIGHTHOUSE VILLAGE WITH STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS 1B
STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Planning Commission
make the following decision:
OR
B. The applicant to construct one-lane
approaches on both the east bound, LHVD, a private drive, and westbound on
Staff
further recommends: Planning Commission approve CUP 07-12 with
the following conditions, in addition to A or B above:
·
All trees susceptible to moose will have
winter protection.
·
Trees that do not survive the winter will be
replanted the following growing season.
·
Landscaping to be installed in phases, in
conjunction with the building phases.
·
For a year round visual buffer, 50% of the
tree planting to be evergreens.
·
The minimum trunk diameter is 1 ½” for
deciduous trees. A minimum 3 foot height
for evergreen trees.
Commissioner Minsch commented that if they are
going to postpone action she wants to have a complete packet with all of the
information that has been considered.
There was discussion that the first application
presented was different from the one that has been reconsidered. Point was
raised that the TIA was based on the first application.
HESS/STORM MOVED TO POSTPONE ACTION OF THE
RECONSIDERATION TO A SPECIAL MEETING ON JUNE 30TH TO INCLUDE A NEW
PUBLIC HEARING.
There was brief discussion regarding the 45 day
timeline required for action. It was noted that the applicant wants to submit
new information and Acting City Planner Engebretsen said she could get an
extension from the applicant if needed.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
The Commission hears a report from staff.
Commission business includes resolutions, ordinances, zoning issues, requests
for reconsideration and other issues as needed. The Commission may ask
questions of staff, applicants, and the public. Any items brought before the
Commission for discussion are on the floor for discussion following
introduction of the item. The Commission will accept testimony or a
presentation on agenda items that involve an applicant (such as acceptance of a
non conformity).
A.
Staff
There were no applicant comments.
MINSCH/ZAK MOVED TO ADOPT
There was brief discussion supporting the non
conformity.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT
Motion carried.
B. Tulin
Terrace Subdivision East Terrace Addition KPB File 2005-123
Commissioner Zak declared he may have a conflict of
interest.
MINSCH/STORM MOVED THAT COMMISSIONER ZAK
Commissioner Zak explained that Mr. Tulin is his
attorney.
VOTE: NON OBJECTION: UNANIMOUS CONSENT
Motion carried.
Commissioner Zak left the table.
Acting City Planner Engebretsen explained that time
extension requests don’t require any action from the Commission; the extensions
are informational from the Borough. She noted it would have been a good change
to have it as an informational item when they revised their bylaws.
Commissioner Zak returned to the table.
INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS
There were no informational
items.
COMMENTS OF THE AUDIENCE
Members of the Audience may
address the Commission on any subject.
There were no audience
comments.
COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION
Commissioners may comments
on any subject, including requests to staff and requests for excused absence.
Commissioner Hess said the 30th will be
his last meeting and it has been a pleasure working with everyone.
Commissioner Storm asked that all the
Commissioners, including herself, read the TIA and get a good comprehension of
what it is recommending for their reconsideration on the 30th.
Commissioner Zak had no comments.
Commissioner Minsch requested that it gets
clarified with the City Clerk what they can consider regarding the
Chair Kranich commented that it has been a pleasure
working with Commissioner Hess. There has been good discussion about differing
view points and thinks he will be hard to replace.
ADJOURN
Notice of the next regular
or special meeting or work session will appear on the agenda following
“adjournment”.
There being no further business to come before the
Commission, the meeting adjourned at
MELISSA JACOBSEN, DEPUTY
Approved: