Session 10-11,
a Regular Meeting of the Homer Advisory Planning Commission was called to order
by Chair Minsch at 5:37 p.m. on June 24, 2010 at the City Hall Cowles Council
Chambers located at 491 E. Pioneer Avenue, Homer, Alaska.
PRESENT: COMMISSIONER BOS, DRUHOT, HIGHLAND, KRANICH, MINSCH, SINN
STAFF: CITY
PLANNER ABBOUD
CITY
MANAGER WREDE
DEPUTY
CITY CLERK JACOBSEN
APPROVAL
OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved by consensus
of the Commission.
PUBLIC
HEARINGS
Testimony limited to
3 minutes per speaker. The
Commission conducts Public Hearings by hearing a staff report, presentation by
the applicant, hearing public testimony and then acting on the Public Hearing
items. The Commission may
question the public. Once the public hearing is closed the Commission
cannot hear additional comments on the topic. The applicant is not held to the 3 minute time
limit.
A. Appeal of an
Enforcement Order at 397 E. Pioneer Avenue, Refuge Chapel
Chair
Minsch began the proceedings by explaining that this is an appeal by the Refuge
Chapel of an Enforcement Order to Discontinue Use of Property Located at Lot 5,
Block 6 Glacier View Subdivision, 397 E. Pioneer Avenue, as an Overnight
Facility or Submit a Completed Application for a Conditional Use Permit within
30 Days of Receipt. She recognized the
parties from the Refuge Chapel as appellants and City Planner Abboud as
appellee.
Chair
Minsch asked if any Commissioner has a potentially disqualifying interest of
partiality in this matter. There was no response from the Commissioners. She
advised that each party would have 30 minutes to make their presentations and
the appellant would have 5 minutes for a rebuttal.
Representatives from the Refuge Chapel
included Pastor Darren Williams and Doug Dodd. Each read letters
that were provided to the Commission as laydown items. Both letters explained
the operations of the facility, how they believe it meets the City Code description
of a rooming house, and requesting abatement of the City Planner’s enforcement
order.
City Planner Abboud said he is here as
a matter of procedure, noting that originally he stated this operation is a
rooming house. There was a hearing with the Planning Commission which resulted
in an unclear vote of the determination. It was appealed to the Board of Adjustment
and they determined that the Commission’s vote did overrule the City Planner’s
decision of the rooming house. He is unaware of why it is not a rooming house,
he does not believe the circumstance have changed significantly since he made
that determination. City Planner Abboud explained that he accepted the decision
of the BOA and since his ruling was overturned, he can’t accept that this is a
rooming house. He chose not to further appeal the decision that was made by the
Board of Adjustment.
Chair Minsch offered the appellant
their five minute rebuttal.
Mr. Dodd commented that it doesn’t
sound like this is an argument, it sounds like there are some procedural
issues. He referenced the Board of Adjustment finding 2 where they say it is
the Commission’s job. He doesn’t think they felt it wasn’t a rooming house,
they just felt the procedure was inappropriate, the Commission had a 2-3 vote,
it was a technical argument. He feels that finding 2 seems to give the
Commission the authority and responsibility to make the decision.
Chair Minsch opened the public
hearing.
John Williams said he wants to
reiterate what has been said before. The Refuge Chapel is here to help the City
in a matter with men who have no place to stay. He has lived here since 1974 and
has seen a lot of camps and workers living in the woods along the highway. When
his son came and started the church, he had a heart to help men that came to
town to work and need a place to stay. Churches help people like that. It was
fine when no one was close and it wasn’t in the middle of town. Then there was
one very vocal person who objected and made it a more blown out of proportion
situation than it really is. Mr. Williams does not believe they have a problem;
they are part of the solution. He urged the Commission to understand that.
Closing them down will cause a problem because there are people who need help
and don’t have a lot of money. There are not a lot of services that will do
that for guys. He thanked the Commission.
Jim Pastro who attends Refuge Chapel, referenced
the letter in the packet date stamped March 21, 2010 which he wrote. He
explained that the Refuge Chapel chose to pull their CUP and start the process
over. He submitted documentation regarding the way the rooming house is run. He
found it interesting because he spoke to Mr. Abboud in early March asking him
to look at the facility, to work with the Refuge Chapel and suggest how they
might change the operation to be in compliance with the definition of rooming
house in the City Code. Instead Mr. Abboud wrote the enforcement order dated
March 10. Mr. Pastro said they chose to pull the CUP because the statement of
findings from the Board of Adjustment, it says the Board finds that yes, the
City Planner does have the authority to determine that a certain use requires a
conditional use permit. He questioned if an applicant requests for a CUP that
needed some little things to change in the operation of the business, would the
City Planner say that they couldn’t do it or would he recommend suggestions of
how they could work together for their benefit and the City’s benefit. Mr.
Pasto said that was his heart when he contacted Mr. Abboud, but here they are
today.
There were no further public comments
and Chair Minsch closed the public hearing and oral arguments.
Chair Minsch noted for the record that
there is a copy of the 2/21/2007 minutes from the HAPC, a June 24, 2010 letter
from Pastor Darren Williams, a parking and building plan from January 10, 2007,
and a June 23rd letter from Doug Dodd to the HAPC.
KRANICH/BOS MOVED TO ENTER INTO
DELIBERATIONS AT THE CONCLUSION OF THEIR OTHER BUSINESS TONIGHT.
Commissioner Kranich felt it would be
best to begin deliberations tonight while the information was fresh.
Commissioner Highland suggested it
would be better to deliberate now rather than at the end of the meeting.
VOTE: YES: BOS, MINSCH, DRUHOT,
KRANICH, SINN
NO:
HIGHLAND
Motion carried.
PENDING
BUSINESS
A. Draft
Spit Comprehensive Plan
The Commission continued their
worksession type discussion of the Draft Spit Comprehensive Plan and then
adjourned the meeting to deliberate.
COMMENTS
OF THE AUDIENCE
Members of the audience may address
the Commission on any subject. (3 minute
time limit)
COMMENTS
OF THE COMMISSION
ADJOURN
Meetings will adjourn promptly at 10
p.m. An extension is allowed by a vote
of the Commission. The next Regular Meeting is scheduled for May 5, 2010 at
7:00 p.m. in the Cowles Council Chambers. There will be a work session at
5:30p.m. prior to the meeting.
There being no further business to
come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at m 7:17 p.m. The next
regular meeting is scheduled for July 21, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall
Cowles Council Chambers. There is a worksession at 5:30 p.m. prior to the
meeting.
Melissa Jacobsen, CMC, Deputy City
Clerk
Approved: