PORT AND HARBOR ADVISORY COMMISSION UNAPPROVED
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 28, 2009
Session 09-01 A Regular Meeting of
the Port and Harbor Advisory Commission was called to order at 6:00 pm on
January 28, 2009 by Chair Otto Kilcher at the City Hall Cowles Council Chambers
located at 491 E. Pioneer Avenue, Homer, Alaska.
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS ULMER, KILCHER, VELSKO, CARROLL, HOGAN AND WEDIN
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS HARTLEY, MARTIN (EXCUSED)
STAFF: PORT
& HARBOR DIRECTOR HAWKINS
ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR MOORE
DEPUTY CITY CLERK KRAUSE
APPROVAL OF THE
AGENDA
HOGAN/ULMER - MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
There was no discussion.
The agenda was approved by
consensus of the Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENT
REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA (3 Minute Time
Limit)
Chair Kilcher advised Mr. McCune, his rights to
address the Commission now or later in the meeting.
Mr. McCune, owner of the Fish Factory gave a brief
summary on his request seeking recommendation from the Port and Harbor Advisory
Commission to the Lease Committee to approve a replat of the property he leases
on the Spit and the partial lot he rents yearly from the City for additional
storage.
Chair Kilcher queried if anyone was interested in
suspending the rules to address this agenda item now.
There was no motion to suspend the rules.
Chair Kilcher inquired if anyone requested a break
at this time. There were no requests.
RECONSIDERATION
None.
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
A.
Regular
Meeting Minutes of December 17, 2008
Chair
Kilcher requested a motion to approve the minutes.
ULMER/VELSKO
– MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED.
There was
no discussion.
VOTE.
YES. NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion
carried.
VISITORS
None.
STAFF & COUNCIL REPORT/COMMITTEE
REPORTS/BOROUGH REPORTS
(Chair set time
limit not to exceed 5 minutes)
A.
Port & Harbor Director’s Staff
Report – January 2009
Port & Harbor
Director Hawkins reviewed his report and asked for any comments or questions.
A brief discussion was held on the emergency dredging performed. The
Coast Guard paid for the dredging and the total amount to be removed was
estimated at 700 cubic yards and ended up at 3003 cubic yards. All the material
was sold.
Commissioner Wedin inquired about the Waste Collection RFP. Port &
Harbor Director Hawkins responded that the winning proposal from Moore &
Moore Services incorporated the use of their compactor truck passing the
savings onto the City.
There was no further discussion.
B. Lease Committee Report
Commissioner Velsko reviewed the minutes of the meeting. He stated that the Lease Committee felt that the replat request for the Fish Factory should be remanded back to the Port & Harbor Commission since the parcel that is included in the replat is where the outfall is and no building can be done on this parcel now or in the future. He recommended that the report be reviewed. It is very informative.
Commissioner Velsko commented that the agenda was very aggressive and that there will be a Special Meeting on Thursday, February 12, 2009 at 3:00 p.m.
There was no further discussion.
PUBLIC HEARING (3 minute time limit)
None.
PENDING BUSINESS
A.
Port
& Harbor Budget Review
a. Question
and Answers Session with Accounting Supervisor Laurie Moore
b. Determine
Budget Items to Establish a Review Schedule for Monthly Agenda
Chair Kilcher requested a motion
to discuss.
ULMER/CARROLL – MOVED TO DISCUSS.
There was no discussion.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Commissioner Hogan opened the
discussion by stating there is a lot to do and review to be ready for the next
budget season. The dialogue continued regarding the amount of time put into the
budget process by the Port & Harbor Director along with other
administrative personnel. Port & Harbor Director Hawkins stated that the
hardest line items to budget were the costs for utilities and fuel.
Chair Kilcher suggested leaving
it in the hands of the Port & Harbor Director and using his discretion
bring it before the Commission. Commissioner Hogan felt that it should be a
regular agenda item until they have full understanding of the budget processes.
There was further exchange regarding the timeline involved and presentation to
the Council for first review. Additional talk centered on the percentage of the
yearly increase and what funds are used to pay unpaid bills.
HOGAN/CARROLL - MOVED TO ADD
BUDGET REVIEW AS A REGULAR AGENDA ITEM.
There was debate on the benefit
of having this as a regular agenda item with notations that it was not
necessary to spend a lot of time discussing it. Commissioner Carroll suggested
Accounting Supervisor Moore give the Commissioners a monthly question that they
must answer. This would make it fun too. Commissioner Ulmer stated that there
definitely was a need to read and review the budget to familiarize themselves
with the process.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
There was no further discussion.
B.
Dedicated
Sales Tax Funding
Review of recommendations and
discussion from November meeting.
HOGAN/VELSKO - MOVED TO DISCUSS.
There was no discussion.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS
CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Commissioner Velsko opened the
discussion by requesting input from Accounting Supervisor Moore on setting up
or changing the Harbor Enterprise Fund into a fund that involved the sales tax
revenue produce by the Harbor similar to the Water & Sewer Fund. He
recommended inclusion of the easily identifiable revenue producers from the
Spit. He mentioned that City Manager Wrede stated there were a few options.
Accounting Supervisor Moore
explained the accounting process for revenues generated by the Harbor and she
responded that it would not be difficult if the amount were determined by a
percentage amount. The next thing would be the items of revenue that would be
used. She further explained that Council would have to approve this action.
After further discussion,
Commissioner Velsko then restated for confirmation that a new study would have
to be done.
Accounting Supervisor Moore’s
response was inaudible.
Commissioner Hogan commented that
in accordance with the State code that a dedicated fund is not permissible. He
then quoted from the Homer City Code, Title 10, 10.04.060, Use of Revenues. He
then interpreted that to mean that the Harbor is a separate accounting deal.
The funds need to be intercepted before reaching City Hall.
Chair Kilcher pointed out that they
would still have administration provided by the city. So if they have
administrators ten percent of the time, the money needs to stay in the Harbor
when they are working for the Port & Harbor.
Dialogue developed on how this all
came to be regarding the recommendation that the City Manager was asked to
present a resolution to City Council. The following meeting Commissioner Hogan
or Velsko were not present and the remaining Commissioners postponed discussion
until Commissioner Hogan or Velsko were available to discuss the item since
they were the proponents of this agenda item.
Commissioner Ulmer requested
information on what the actual question was regarding this issue. Port &
Harbor Director Hawkins referenced the minutes of the November meeting.
Accounting Supervisor Moore
commented on the revenues generated by the services provided by the Port &
Harbor. Further details on her statement were in audible.
Chair Kilcher reiterated the
process, as he understood it for clarification. The revenue goes to the general
fund, and then there is a vote by the residents that a certain percentage of
the tax revenue goes back to the Spit. He then gave an example of why people
come or stay in Homer. He agreed that there are four or five items that are
strictly provided on the Spit and he believes they would be easy to track.
Commissioner Carroll pointed out
the cap on sales tax. He additionally commented that the City Council would not
be agreeable for further monies to be withdrawn from the general fund.
Commissioner Wedin declared that
room and charters are taxed daily.
Commissioner Velsko stated the
first task is to track the revenues. This would provide the information and
show that the Harbor is making money or losing it. He held the opinion that it
would show the Council and the Public how much money the Harbor does make and
they will stop making the remarks that the Harbor is a losing entity. Maybe in
the future the Harbor can use the fund strictly for the Spit.
There was further conversation on
which revenue items needed to be tracked, some of these items were the sales
tax generated at the Fuel Float; ship loading and moorage; supplementary
dialogue included the effects of increased tourism on the Spit. It was
suggested that the vendors on the Spit could report their sales taxes collected
on orange colored forms instead of white.
Accounting Supervisor Moore stated
that maybe a solution however sales tax was paid directly to the Borough, not
the City.
Chair Kilcher commented on this
process comparing it to the Local Improvement District process and then stated
that he strongly believes that the residents of Homer should take pride in the
Spit, making it the “grooviest” place to go would benefit the entire town.
Commissioner Velsko recapped that
to forward something to the City Manager he proposed a motion and recommended
voting on the motion and the City can hash out the details. It will come back
to the Commission and at that time the Commission can be more specific. He
tentatively proposed the following:
Sales tax generated by the Port and
Harbor will be returned to the Port and Harbor Enterprise Fund.
There was further dialogue on what
should be contained in the motion. Commissioner Wedin stated that the contention
seemed to be with the word “dedicate” and that it may be a better to track
sales first. Accounting Supervisor Moore commented on the difficulty of
tracking all sales generated by the Port & Harbor. Chair Kilcher offered a
figure to give an example.
Commissioner Velsko suggested that
the Commission submit the following motion instead to City Manager Wrede.
VELSKO/ WEDIN - MOVED TO SEND A
MEMORANDUM TO CITY MANAGER WREDE TO RECOMMEND THE CITY OF HOMER TRACK SALES TAX
REVENUES GENERATED BY THE PORT & HARBOR FOR ONE YEAR.
Talk ensued about the revenue to be
included in the study. Commissioner Wedin questioned including the Charter
package deals. Further discussion included all different aspects and users that
pay sales tax on the Spit. Chair Kilcher offered the opinion that it was a
language aspect and could be dealt with after the study. Accounting Supervisor
Moore stated she would have to check with the Borough on how detail a report
she could receive from them.
VELSKO/HOGAN – AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION
TO ADD THE LANGUAGE, AND TO RETURN SALES TAX REVENUE TO THE HARBOR ENTERPRISE
FUND.
VOTE. YES. WEDIN, KILCHER, ULMER,
VELSKO, CARROLL, HOGAN
Motion carried.
VOTE. (Main Motion). YES. KILCHER,
ULMER, VELSKO, CARROLL, HOGAN, WEDIN.
Motion carried.
Commissioner Velsko added that even
if City Council does not approve to return the revenue to the Harbor Fund if
the City performed the tracking for a year then it would show them the revenue
that the Harbor generated.
There was no further discussion.
Hogan/carroll
- moved they suspend the rules to address Item B under New Business due to the
lateness of the evening.
There was no discussion.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS
CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Chair Kilcher called for a recess
at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m.
C.
Strategic Plan – Goals and Projects
ULMER/CARROLL – MOVED TO POSTPONE
UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING.
There was no discussion.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS
CONSENT.
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
A.
Welcome
to new Commissioner Pete Wedin (if present)
The Commissioners welcomed the
newest Commissioner, Mr. Pete Wedin.
B.
Fish
Factory Replat Request
Chair Kilcher requested a motion
to discuss.
Commissioner Hogan and Carroll
declared that they might have a conflict of interest.
Commissioner Hogan explained that
he has had prior business dealings with the Fish Factory; he has been a
customer, vendor and leases property next to the parcel in question.
Commissioners Ulmer, Carroll and Velsko stated at that time that it might be
perceived they have a conflict too since they have had business dealings with
the Fish Factory. Chair Kilcher asked Commissioner Hogan if he would not be
able to look at this objectively or felt that his prior dealings would affect
his judgment on this item. He responded that at this time he did not feel that
he would be unable to judge the information presented impartially. He declared
that at this time he has no interest in the parcel in question.
Chair Kilcher questioned
Commissioners Carroll, Ulmer and Velsko and in view of the information and
responses did not feel that there was a conflict of interest from any of the
Commissioners.
Chair Kilcher requested a motion
to discuss.
HOGAN/ULMER – MOVED TO DISCUSS
ITEM 10.B. NEW BUSINESS, FISH FACTORY REPLAT.
There was no discussion.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Chair Kilcher requested
supplementary information from Mr. Mike McCune, owner of the Fish Factory. Mr.
McCune confirmed what the Commission had read in the report from Commissioner
Velsko regarding the request and the Commission reviewed the minutes from the
Lease Committee.
Mr. McCune stated the
circumstances by which he would like to have the portion of Lot 12 B added to
Lot 12A1 lease. He stated that since 2003 he has been leasing it from the City
at half the value and adding it to his current lease will add more revenue to
the city. He indicated that he preferred a more permanent long-term solution as
his reasoning for pursuing the re-plat. He was concerned that when the Council,
Commission members and City Administration personnel changes that it will cause
a problem with the existing agreement. He affirmed that there were no problems
regarding financing or any requirement of having this parcel to obtain future
financing. He assured the Commissioners that the City would have free access to
the outfall.
Further dialog included
alternative options to keep the parcel separate but at a lesser rate; exactly
where the location was on the Spit; if approved it would not prevent or impede
its usability by the existing cluster of businesses; a continued month to month
rent is not allowed in accordance to City Policy for longer than 6 months; the
parcel will never be built on since the outfall is under that parcel; if this
should be reviewed by the Economic Development Advisory Commission; the Lease
Committee concerns were encumbrances on Lot 12 B and at this time there does
not appear to be anything to worry about; this will enhance the area plus add
revenue for the City; biggest concern for the Port & Harbor personnel or
City was complete access to the outfall line; property setbacks concerning
building in the future on the re-platted property; the additional property will
increase the size of the lot comparable to that of Lot 12 C.
VELSKO/CARROLL - MOVED TO
RECOMMEND THE LEASE COMMITTEE APPROVE THE RE-PLAT REQUEST FROM THE FISH
FACTORY.
There was no discussion.
VOTE. YES. Ulmer, velsko, carroll, Hogan, wedin, kilcher
Motion carried.
There was a brief discussion on
when the next meeting of the Lease Committee was scheduled. There is a Special
Meeting on February 12, 2009 at 3:00 p.m.
C.
Land
Allocation Plan Review
Chair Kilcher requested a motion
to bring to the floor.
HOGAN/ULMER - MOVED TO DISCUSS
ITEM C. NEW BUSINESS.
There was no discussion.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Discussion on the proposed lots
for Lease on the Spit, Lot 21, Lots 11 and 12; concern from the Lease Committee
was expressed at the last meeting on Lot 21 fitting into the Overslope
Development; interest from Seldovia regarding Ferry; concern on ample parking
for the Ferry; building a ramp and how it would be funded; the Ferry will be
home ported in Seldovia and have priority parking not reserved.
Commissioner Wedin asked if
leasing Lot 21 would diminish the value any. He confirmed with the
Commissioners that certain parcels were already designated for parking. The
Commissioners digressed briefly on the parking lot and road conditions in hat
area. Port and Harbor Director Hawkins responded that the Ferry is supposed to
be ready this summer. There is no date set for actual operations starting. He
directed the Commissioners that it must be considered if a private entity
should be allowed to build a ramp into the Harbor. This issue was mentioned.
The Commissioners discussed the estimated cost to the City to build a covered
ramp. The parking would be priority use not reserved. It was recommended that
if a ramp is built it should be built between two parcels or on one since the
value of a “public ramp” built on leased lot would have no value, unless the
entire lot was designated as parking and it should be paid parking; the
difference in value to send multiple lots out for lease; all other parcels in
the Land Allocation Plan has not changed;
Velsko/ulmer
– moved that the Port and harbor advisory Commission recommends THE LEASE
COMMITTEE PUT Lot 21 out For Proposal as soon as reasonably possible.
Commissioner Hogan did not feel
that a lot should be singled out; that all City owned property should be
bringing in revenue or be sold. It was noted that some of the land is being
used for parking and recommended for Overslope Development. Commissioner Wedin
asked if designated as overslope then parking was provided. It was stated that
if one was doing overslope development that they would purchase lease uplands
to provide parking for their business. Additional comments regarding decisions
made on overslope development was conducted. It was questioned if the Overslope
recommendations submitted were ever approved. A comment was made that it would
be a more lucrative approach to change it to a Build to Suit Lease Policy
instead of allowing individual businesses to lease a build whatever suits them.
It was noted by that Lot 22 would be pulled from that Request for Proposal
letting. More comments and discussion on bringing a more fixed direction and
purpose to the Spit allowing for cohesiveness using overslope development, the
probability of that happening in the current times, benefits of making the
building requirements contain language that the structures installed should be
“add onable”. Commissioner Velsko felt that Port & Harbor Director Hawkins
and himself can bring and represent the Commissions concerns to the Lease Committee
without including language in the motion. Commissioner Wedin inquired about the
Zoning laws; he agreed with Commissioner Ulmer’s description and comments about
the ultimate goals for the Spit he offered that if amenities, ramps etc are
built that would encourage more businesses to come and build in that area.
HOGAN/ulmer
– MOVED TO AMEND THAT MOTION TO READ “RECOMMENDS LOTS 19-26”
This would allow all lots to be
offered and a person could lease one or all, building standards would be later,
no parking designated.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Further discussion regarding the
standards for building on the lots were held. It was agreed that it should be a
separate motion.
Commissioner Hogan called for the
question.
VOTE. (MAIN MOTION) YES. VELSKO,
CARROLL, HOGAN, WEDIN, KILCHER, ULMER.
Motion carried.
Commissioner Ulmer stated she had
concerns regarding the future development on the Spit and wanted to make sure
they did not end up with mismatched shanties. She wanted the area cleaned up.
HOGAN/ULMER - MOVED TO RECOMMEND
THAT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ON THE SPIT BE INCLUDED AS AN AGENDA ITEM AT THE
LAND ALLOCATION PLAN WORKSESSION.
Commissioner Velsko commented
that standards for overslope development were discussed in depth and created
some time ago. It was agreed that Council has never approved or been presented
the standards made on overslope development.
Port and Harbor Director Hawkins
reminded the Commissioners that they spoke about making a motion to encourage
overslope development of those lots that were to be let for proposal.
Chair Kilcher stated he would
entertain a motion on that subject.
Deputy City Clerk Krause reminded
the Commissioners that there was a motion on the floor.
Commissioner Hogan said he would
accept this as an amendment to his motion.
VELSKO/ULMER – MOVED TO AMEND THE
MOTION TO READ, “AND ENCOURAGE OVERSLOPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BE USED FOR LOTS
19 THROUGH 26.
There was no discussion.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Chair Kilcher respoke the amended
main motion as MOVED TO RECOMMEND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ON THE SPIT BE AN
AGENDA ITEM FOR THE WORKSESSION AND THAT OVERSLOPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BE
USED FOR LOTS 19-26.
VOTE. (MAIN MOTION). YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
The Commission reviewed the
additional lots available for lease and agreed with the current designations
shown on the majority of the lots available on the Spit.
HOGAN/VELSKO - MOVED TO SEPARATE
LOTS 9A, 10A AND LET OUT FOR PROPOSAL SEPARATELY AND REMOVE LOT 12B FROM
AVAILABLE PROPERTIES TO LEASE.
Further discussion on the
benefits of letting the lots out to RFP separately does not hinder someone from
submitting a proposal on both lots.
There was a call for the question
by Commissioner Carroll.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Additional discussion regarding
Lots 13b, the old Porpoise Room. It did have short term leases. It was
discussed whether the Commission should recommend to continue the short term
leases. Port & Harbor Director Hawkins cited again that at this time they
are outside the City Lease Policy. The Commissioners discussed what the term or
length the RFP will stay advertised. Port & Harbor Director Hawkins related
the incident with Kenai River Seafoods and that is what they wanted to avoid in
the future. If no one is interested in long term leases then there should be
the option that the City could lease on a monthly basis.
The commission agreed by
consensus that Lot 13B should stay on the available list.
D.
Memorandum
from City Clerk Johnson Re: Joint Worksession with City Council on Land
Allocation Plan.
The Commissioners discussed
attendance at the worksession and getting there early enough to garner seats and
sit together as a show of strength. Chair Kilcher will attend this meeting and
Commissioner Hogan will be there.
Deputy Clerk Krause listed all
the Commissions and Board that was invited to attend this worksession.
E.
Port
& Harbor Bylaws – Introduction of Agenda Items
HOGAN/ULMER – MOVED TO DISCUSS
There was no discussion.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Commissioner Hogan proposed that
the Port & Harbor Advisory Commission By Laws be changed to allow
Commissioners to add items to the agenda and add a Student to the Commission.
The student member would not be a voting member and must be a finishing their
Junior year through Senior year of High School. Further discussion on the two
changes resulted and the Commissioners agreed to separate into separate
motions.
Commissioner Hogan explained his
reasons for proposing the following changes to the Commissions Bylaws:
HOGAN/ULMER - MOTION TO AMEND THE
BYLAWS TO DELETE MAJORITY CONSENSUS AND ADDING AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE ADDED AT THE
REQUEST OF STAFF OR INDIVIDUAL COMMISSION MEMBERS.
The vote is to add to the agenda
for next month. They are to introduce the motions at this meeting and vote on
them at the next meeting. Chair Kilcher requested confirmation from Deputy
Clerk Krause on the rules regarding amendments to the bylaws. This is the
introduction and discussion and the
Commission will vote on the changes at the next meeting. This vote is to add to
the February agenda.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
HOGAN/VELSKO - MOVED TO ADD TO
THE BYLAWS A STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE TO SERVE A TERM FROM JUNE OF THEIR JUNIOR
YEAR THROUGH GRADUATION.
Brief discussion held on the
reasoning for designating High School Seniors over other grades. Keeping it to
Seniors will allow them to use it as their Senior project.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
F.
Homer
City Code Title 10 - Port & Harbor
HOGAN/CARROLL - MOVED TO DISCUSS.
There was no discussion.
VOTE. YES. NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS
CONSENT.
Motion carried.
Commissioner Hogan asked for this
to be place on the agenda because over the last several years the Tariff has
been amended and changed with no input from the Port and Harbor Advisory
Commission. He cited the code that requires that a public hearing be held on
changes to be made. He would like to return to following the law. Further
discussion was held regarding what should be done to correct this problem. It
was noted that a public hearing has not been held for the last several years.
Commissioner Velsko asked if what
was needed was to pass a motion to recommend City Council follows City Code.
Commissioner Hogan stated that he informed Council that they were in violation
and he also brought up that City Councilpersons could be fined $350.00 each day
in violation. City Council did not respond or react to his notice.
Commissioner Wedin inquired how the
resolution was generated. Commissioner Hogan explained the process and Public
Hearings are normally held for Ordinances not Resolutions. The Commissioners
agreed that they wanted to be part of the process.
The Commissioners agreed that the
Budget Hearings did not cover the Tariff increases. Council must follow the
rules.
VELSKO/ULMER – RECOMMEND A
MEMORANDUM BE SENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND COPIED TO THE CITY MANAGER THAT
PUBLIC HEARINGS BE HELD REGARDING AMENDMENTS TO THE PORT AND HARBOR TARIFF IN
ACCORDANCE WITH HOMER CITY CODE 10.04.035
AND HOMER CITY CODE 10.04.055
Discussion
on best practices to stop the City Council from non-compliance of established
laws; topics included were how City Council gets the changes and that if they
do not follow the rules someone could take the City to court to roll back all
increases to the tariff that were passed and a
Public Hearing was not held.
VOTE.
YES. NON-OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion
carried.
INFORMATIONAL
MATERIALS
A.
Harbormaster’s
Monthly Statistical Report for December 2008
B.
Weekly
Crane and Ice Report
C.
Deep
Water Dock
D.
Pioneer
Dock
E.
Pioneer
Dock Ferry Landings
F.
Commissioner
Attendance Schedule for Council Meetings 2009
Chair Kilcher requested motions to
discuss any of the informational items.
Commissioner Hogan asked to switch
with someone for the July council meeting. He offered to take both February
meetings. A recommendation was made to ask Commissioner Hartley. Chair Kilcher
offered to trade his April meeting with Commissioner Hogan.
Deputy City Clerk Krause noted that
Commissioner Carroll is not on the schedule and that leaves the month of June
vacant. She then asked if Commissioner
Carroll was going to renew his Commission. He did say he planned on staying. He
would be unable to attend the June meeting.
Commissioner Velsko offered to
attend the June 8, 2009 since there was no one scheduled.
There was no further discussion.
COMMENTS OF THE
AUDIENCE
There
were no comments.
COMMENTS OF THE
CITY STAFF
There were no comments.
COMMENTS OF THE
COUNCILMEMBER (If one is appointed)
None.
COMMENTS OF THE
CHAIR
Chair Kilcher thanked everyone for
their work.
COMMENTS OF THE
COMMISSION
Commissioner Hogan thanked everyone and the
attention they paid to the budget.
Commissioner Carroll, Velsko, Wedin and Ulmer had no
comments.
There being no further business
before the Port and Harbor Advisory Commission Chair Kilcher adjourned the
meeting at 8:50 p.m. The next regular meeting is scheduled for 6:00 p.m. on
February 25, 2009 at City Hall, Cowles Council Chambers, 491 E. Pioneer Avenue,
Homer, Alaska.
Renee Krause, Deputy City Clerk I
Approved: