Session 04-03, a Regular Meeting of the Homer Parks
& Recreation Advisory Commission was called to order on
PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: WEAVER, POORE, LANGMAN, HAMIK,
DAUGHARTY
STAFF: DEPUTY CITY CLERK
JOHNSON
SPECIAL
PROJECT COORDINATOR HOLEN
AGENDA APPROVAL
The agenda was amended to add Playground Equipment
to COMMISSION BUSINESS and approved by consensus of the Commission.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
The
Regular Meeting Minutes of
PUBLIC COMMENTS UPON MATTERS
ALREADY ON THE AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
VISITORS
Barb Seaman was present to speak of
the prospect of a greenhouse. She read a
letter from Public Works Director Meyer dated
Ms. Seaman said she believes the
greenhouse is a great idea and perfectly suited for the Poopdeck
property. She said there are two city
parcels of land in the same area and questioned if there would be any benefit
working on the KHLT property rather than city property. The KHLT property would provide closer
proximity to the community garden and she thinks the KHLT would be open to
collaboration of the greenhouse. She added
that greenhouses are great revenue generators for the cities they are in as not
only do they produce annual flowers that the parks and recreation needs each
year, but they are a place to go for lunch or have a wedding. Ms. Seaman does not know what type of
partnership the City and KHLT could work on, but indicated that the Town Center
Development Committee (TCDC) is currently working on ideas for the development
of that central area of town. She added
that the KHLT park plans are on hold until the TCDC makes a decision.
Commissioner Poore said while in
Chair Daugharty questioned the
location of the KHLT and city lots and a map was provided with Ms. Seaman defining
the lots for the Commission. Ms. Seaman
said the TCDC is hoping to see a civic anchor in the
Commissioner Hamik said the
greenhouse has been on the CIP (Capital Improvement Projects) list. Ms. Seaman stated that
In response to Chair Daugharty’s question as to how much land was needed to
create a quality town square area, Ms. Seaman said
that would depend on what he thought a town square was. She said people consider the town square as a
park and a place where there is a concentration of business. While there are different opinions, her own feeling is that an area of green space is needed
although a wilderness park is not needed in the center of town. She said a busy people place is needed with
activities and lawns for picnics and frisbees. That does not require a lot of acreage and in
looking at other communities when there is too much protected land it is not a
valuable, vital common anymore. Ms.
Seaman said
Commissioner Poore asked for a
letter from Carey Meyer, Public Works Director on his ideas for a community
greenhouse. Ms. Poore said she is a
little vague on the Parks and Recreation Commission’s role in facilitating a
greenhouse, but said the greenhouse seems like a worthy endeavor.
Chair Daugharty said he is in
agreement with a greenhouse but it appears the parcels need to be identified as
adjoining land masses to create the
Commissioner Weaver questioned if
the TCDC’s goal was to have a landscape or design
plan specific for each site. Ms. Seaman
said the plan will go through the Planning Commission and then to the public
hearing process. She said CIRI may
decide it doesn’t want to make its plans yet, thus it may not all happen at
once. The professional consultant, the
Chair of the Planning Commission and city staff will work through the
process.
Chair Daugharty would like to
earmark the two city parcels that adjoin the KHLT properties and the CIRI lands
and designate it as
In response to the Commission’s
question of what they could contribute to the process, Ms. Seaman said
recommendations could be made that certain things were pursued such as a
greenhouse or parks and recreation like things.
She said the TCDC could be urged of the greenhouse idea and it would
give strength and credibility to the concept.
She said exploring partnership options with the City, and encouraging
trails or parks within the plan would lend strength.
Commissioner Weaver questioned if
the City of
Commissioner Hamik requested a Worksession before the next regular meeting to focus on
parks. The Commission agreed that an
extra meeting would be beneficial.
Chair Daugharty said over the years
the Parks and Recreation Commission has spun its wheels and have paid a trails
organizer to provide a development plan although there has never been any
support from the city administration.
The TCDC has come on the scene as a progressive group of individuals
identifying one area and trying to carry a plan through. There has never been a city staff member who
has brought it all together and that is what is missing, a staff member who has
taken all the ideas and put them into a logical and reasonable document. The Commission has recommended Capital
Improvement Projects, looked at trails, at park planning, at
In response to Barb Seaman’s
question if the Parks and Recreation Commission had a budget, Chair Daugharty
said a reserve fund was earmarked for capital development areas. Ms. Seaman said a facilitator outside the
group could figure out how to mesh more with the Planning Department, TCDC, and
the Road Standards Committee. She said
the Comprehensive Plan that was recently updated could be used as the
Commission’s bible where they could make priorities happen within it.
Commissioner Hamik said the City
Council is a great group and receptive.
She said if people continue to attend the meetings with important issues
the Council would be willing to help, but if no one shows up they have no way
of knowing the needs.
Commissioner Langman suggested the
Commission could research the needs individually and bring some ideas to the
table. Chair Daugharty said he would
volunteer to go to the next City Council meeting and have a special Commission meeting
with a staff member who is a policy maker and here to help us. Commissioner Langman agreed a staff member
providing direction and defining the mechanisms would be beneficial. Commissioner Weaver added that he is both a retired
City Manager and City Planning Director and would do what he could to
help. Commissioner Langman said Mr.
Weaver’s knowledge of the steps to effectively accomplish work and his
familiarity with city government would be beneficial to the Commission.
Commissioner Weaver said he has
worked in cities four times the size of Homer and staff was available to do
things. He said the Parks and Recreation
group is fundamental with one park site within the
Clotho Spinner,
landscape architect at DOWL Engineers, said she was working on the
non-motorized plan for the City of
Ms. Spinner asked the Commission what they would
like to accomplish and Commissioner Langman answered that she would like to see
more effective trails that would flow throughout town. In response to Ms. Spinner’s question how the
plan would be best implemented, Commissioner Langman said a plan with
mechanisms in place to apply the plan from A to Z would be needed. Ms. Spinner said she needed to hear in
reality whom would set the completed non-motorized
transportation and trails plan into motion.
Commissioner Hamik said
Commissioner Poore said the Parks and Recreation
Commission was advisory and questioned if they would have more power if they
were something more. Chair Daugharty
said the Commission’s function would have to be changed through city government. Commissioner Weaver explained that the
Commission is truly a Committee as they are restricted in their powers and are
delegated by the City Manager. Tasking
administrative personnel is not the Parks and Recreation Committee’s role.
Chair Daugharty questioned Ms. Spinner as to why she
would ask the Commission what they wanted when she already had guidelines of
what was to be delivered to the City outlined in the non-motorized trail
plan. Ms. Spinner answered that a trails
plan would not happen from the consultants outside, but rather with engaging
the community and its members to get a plan that reflects the needs of the
community. Ms. Spinner said identifying
a policy and an infrastructure system to help construction of trails become a
reality is needed. She questioned how
Homer would get that done and what is in the policy that could be used. She said plans go on a shelf until there is
funding to update the plans. She said if
a group is not identified to carry charge it is a waste of money and time. Ms. Spinner would like the plan to recommend
the appropriate parties to take the project on whether that requires the city
creating a bicycle pedestrian coordinator or a Commission to take the project
forward.
Commissioner Langman would like the Parks and
Recreation Commission to take on the project so it doesn’t get shelved. She said after reading the Request for
Proposals (RFP) on the trails project she was quite impressed with the scope of
the proposal including the grant writing and mechanisms that would be used to
facilitate the project. Ms. Langman said
someone has to make sure the proposal is carried through to completion.
Ms. Spinner said she wants the plan to be successful
as it is the right thing to do and she is being paid to have the plan
fulfilled. She said without a successful
plan that is followed through she wouldn’t feel as though she’d met her
professional obligations. If the
community is not ready to decide if the Commission or a new
pedestrian/bicycle coordinator follow the plan through, DOWL would
recommend that a new position be created or another task be added to a current
position to follow the plan through.
In response to Chair Daugharty’s
question if the plan will connect parks and facilities to trails, Ms. Spinner
answered that the RFP specifically states a network of non-motorized
transportation routes that connect parts of the city. She said as the architect for the design her job
is to figure out where all of those routes are.
For the most part they have been documented, although corrections and
additions have been made to identify all the important landmarks through a
series of public meetings asking for input.
The public’s participation has helped to define the plan and assure that
the special places are connected and that informal trails are made formal. Ms. Spinner said Kenton Bloom has been taking
her throughout the town and sharing his knowledge. Part of her job consisted of reading all the
prior project plans and policy manuals and assessing their recommendations for
a non-motorized friendly community.
After spending time in Homer she sat down and fit the information
together comparing it with the 1984 plan written by
Chair Daugharty questioned how the City Council
would be directed to appoint or dictate an administrator for the plan, and who
would she appoint. Mr. Daugharty said in
past years there has never been anyone in the city staff that was designated as
the prime motivator who would assure that the plan was followed through. He said a city employee that is going to take
the plan and make it happen is needed.
Ms. Spinner said although she did not feel
comfortable naming a person specifically she did feel comfortable in the
plan. She said a staff member supporting
the commission body is needed. Special
Projects Coordinator Holen said it would be great if Homer had a professional Parks
and Recreation Director with a background in planning or parks and recreation
development. That person could serve as
a staff person on the Parks and Recreation Commission. Ms. Holen said as Homer grows there is more
justification towards such a position.
Commissioner Hamik said if there were funds in the
Parks and Recreation budget a director could be hired. She suggested the Commission could ask the
City Council for funding for a Parks and Recreation Director for next
year. Ms. Spinner suggested a grant
could be written to help pay for a Parks and Recreation Director.
The Commission thanked Ms. Spinner for attending the
meeting and expressed their happiness at having her on the project.
PENDING
BUSINESS
COMMISSION
BUSINESS
A. Trash Can Project
Commissioner Hamik offered the space in her
husband’s shop for preparation and painting of the trash cans. Ms. Hamik suggested the Commissioners review
the information on the trash cans provided by Commissioner McCallum[1]
and defer it to next month’s agenda for discussion.
Commissioner
McCallum’s report will be added to next month’s agenda under The Trash Can
Project under COMMISSION BUSINESS.
B. Follow-up on Trails Walkability and
Trails Plan
(Public
Input Welcome)
Commissioner Poore provided copies of Walkability, the Community Conversation from the
Commissioner Hamik agreed with Commissioner Poore’s description of Mr. Burden’s visit and added that
she was pleased to have him as a guest at her bed and breakfast. Additionally she said Mr. Burden was inspiring
and sincere and truly passionate about his work. In the Whalesong guest
book he wrote, “The coordination of your
Kenai and Homer setting, back to the earth people and generous hospitality
combine to make this an essential stopping point on my journey to work in and
inspire 2,000 communities these ten years of travel. By the way, you are 1,542 along the path and
I hope this is the first of many visits.”
Additionally Ms. Hamik said it was timely for Mr. Burden to be here when
the DOWL group was here. She also
expressed her appreciation to
C. Spring Planting Supplies/Fundraising
The
Commission requested Spring Planting Supplies/Fundraising be deferred to next
month’s agenda under COMMISSION BUSINESS.
D. Memorandum from Deputy City Clerk, Re: Resolution 04-13(A)
Commissioner Langman noted her approval that the
City Council took the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission to
encourage public access trails and easements where feasible and prudent. The Commission discussed the Council’s
comments as to the Trails Session with DOWL Engineers and the impediment of
creating trails in the area.
Commissioner Weaver clarified that the borough platting process outside
cities does not consider native or traditional trails. Additionally Mr. Weaver noted that the
borough had recommended a one-mile extra-territorial platting area around the
cities for future planning.
E. Playground Equipment
Commissioner Hamik said there is a strong need for
playground equipment in Ben Walters Park and
Commissioner Poore said
F. Ordinance 04-12, Appropriating $10,000 for Stocking the Fishin’ Hole From
the Parks and Recreation Reserve Fund
Commissioner Hamik said everyone loves the Fishin’ Hole but that it is inappropriate for the money to
come from the Parks and Recreation Reserve Fund. She said the money could be better used for
the benefit of parks and recreation.
Commissioner Poore agreed that the money would be more appropriately
spent on playground equipment or fences at the parks.
HAMIK/LANGMAN - MOVED THAT THE PARKS & RECREATION
COMMISSION DOES NOT SUPPORT ORDINANCE 04-12.
Commissioner Hamik withdrew her motion and the following motion was
presented:
WEAVER/LANGMAN – MOVED THAT THE PARKS AND RECREATION
ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT ORDINANCE 04-12 NOT BE APPROVED FOR THIS
FUNDING BECAUSE THE COMMISSION FEELS THAT EXPENDITURES FROM THE RESERVE FUND
SHOULD BE FOR CAPITAL EXPENSES RATHER THAN OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURES.
Lou Stewart said both
VOTE: YES. LANGMAN, DAUGHARTY, POORE, HAMIK, WEAVER
Motion carried.
INFORMATIONAL
MATERIALS
A. City Council Meeting Minutes of
B. Certificate of Appointment from Mayor Cushing, Re: Appointment
of
Kenneth Weaver to
the Parks and Recreation Commission
C. Memorandum 04-35 from Mayor Cushing, Re: Reappointment of
D. “Expert Finds Mixed Bag of Walkability”,
Re: Homer News
E. Memorandum from Parks and Recreation Commission to Mayor
Cushing
and City Council, Re: Recommendations of Parks and
Recreation Commission
(Resolution
04-13(A)
F. Memorandum from Parks and Recreation Commission to City
Manager Wrede,
Re: Land Bank
Reserve
G. Memorandum from Parks and Recreation Commission to City
Manager Wrede
and Administrative Assistant Holen, Re: Recommendations for
Karen
H. Letter from Lou Stewart to City Manager Wrede, Re: Drainage
Ditch at Karen
Lou Stewart questioned when the drainage ditch at
COMMENTS
OF AUDIENCE
COMMENTS OF COMMISSIONERS
Commissioner
Poore welcomed new Commissioner Weaver on board and said it was exciting for
her not to be the newest kid on the block anymore. She said Mr. Weaver’s expertise can help the
Commission work through the processes.
Additionally Ms. Poore thanked the visitors for their time and travel to
Homer.
Commissioner
Langman said she appreciates Mr. Weaver joining the Commission and thanked the
public for attending, adding that it was a good meeting.
Commissioner
Weaver thanked the Commission for putting up with him the first night and
additionally thanked the public.
Commissioner
Hamik welcomed Commissioner Weaver and said she appreciates the public and
staff. She would like to see Jo provide follow-up
on the Land Bank and the gate entrance to the
Chair
Daugharty thanked Mr. Stewart for coming and said he hoped he didn’t upset Ms.
Spinner with being his obstinate self.
He thanked the Commission and welcomed Mr. Weaver, stating he was going
to be a great addition.
A Worksession is scheduled
for
ADJOURNMENT
A Worksession for
discussion of a Parks and Recreation Work Plan is scheduled for
___________________________________
JO JOHNSON, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
___________________________________
APPROVED
[1] Commissioner McCallum, although not present, provided an informational memo to the Commissioners outlining plans and a schedule for preparing and painting new trash cans.