Session 07-01 a meeting of the Transportation Advisory Committee was
called to order by Chair Marquardt at
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: KURT
MARQUARDT, STEVE SMITH, DOUG STARK, BRYAN ZAK
ABSENT:
STAFF: DEPUTY
AGENDA APPROVAL
The agenda was approved by consensus of the Committee.
SYNOPSIS APPROVAL
A.
STARK/SMITH – MOVED TO APPROVE THE SYNOPSIS.
There was no discussion.
VOTE: YES. NON OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
PENDING BUSINESS
A. Boulevards – Homer Area
Roads
At the November 2006 meeting boulevards were discussed in great
length. The main point is to connect
theme districts in the key points of town that may deserve special
treatment. The document will allow for
special recognition of certain streets and specific criteria for designated
boulevards.
Chair Marquardt asked that discussion on boulevards be postponed to the
next meeting to look at the language in the document. Copies of the Transportation Plan, Boulevard
Document and the Homer Non Motorized Transportation and Trails Plan will be
provided to new
B. HARP (Homer Accelerated
Roads Program) Policies and Procedures for New Local Roads and Non Motorized
Trails
STARK/SMITH – MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO
Last fall trails were included as an entity to HARP funding.
VOTE: YES. SMITH, ZAK,
MARQUARDT, STARK
Motion carried.
There is a need to decide if the existing road infrastructure should be
upgraded to include sidewalks and pedestrian transportation needs. It would be difficult and expensive to remedy
storm water. If the water was draining
to a collecting system the output would have to be dealt with. The current system is inadequate for
pedestrian trails.
Public Works Director Meyer noted last summer 10,000 lineal ft. of
street repaving was done at a cost of $600,000.
To include sidewalk, curb and gutter the amount would exceed $5M. To comply with DEC regulations storm water
filters, concrete vaults and sedimentation basins are all needed to get rid of
ditch and surface drainage. When the average
person voted to include trails as HARP, they were thinking of concrete
sidewalks downtown or a trail system to connect the outer limits of town. In every other community sidewalks are paid for
and maintained by the property owners that front them.
It was suggested a committee be formed to make recommendations on
sidewalks. In the 1980’s when John
Calhoun put the HARP together there was a need for a roads committee; the same
condition exists today with sidewalks.
Question:
*
Does
it benefit the whole community to share the expense?
Suggestions included:
*
Prioritize
trails.
*
Sidewalks
may not be necessary on each new road.
*
Main
arterials should be given high priority.
*
The
Public Works Director Meyer suggested a methodology could be proposed
to make it real from a financial aspect.
An example is the HAWSP (Homer Accelerated Water and Sewer Program) transition
where the project cost percentage was increased to the property owner to keep the
fund viable. Owners now pay 75% of
project costs.
Suggestions for trails included:
*
Trail
from
*
The
common starting place for trails is 10% of road projects.
*
$1.2M
per year is generated to the program.
The
committee requested the accelerated sidewalks program be pursued to create a basic
loop within the city. The roads that
need pedestrian access the most are
STARK/SMITH
- MOVED TO PLACE THE ITEM ON THE
There
was no additional discussion.
VOTE: YES. NON OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion
carried.
A. Shuttle Bus
Chair Kilcher will be at the next meeting to
share his ideas and experience. It was
the consensus of the committee that Shuttle Bus be continued to the next
meeting under Pending Business.
A.
Resolution
07-18, Re: Use of
STARK/SMITH – MOVED TO APPROVE.
The committee discussed couplets, noting the concerns with truck
traffic off the Spit going up
Public Works Director Meyer noted the couplet would provide an efficient
corridor for pedestrians, as the
The committee asked for a detailed map outlining the traffic flow. Public meetings could be scheduled to get
input.
From a traffic engineering perspective the concept
is good. A standard set of criteria for
road construction cannot be applied to a sidehill
community. It is not an ideal situation,
but we are stuck with what we have now.
Chair Marquardt requested Resolution 07-18 be continued to the next
meeting. Public Works Director Meyer is
to provide a detailed map with the pros and cons. Supporting material on couplets should be
included. The Committee concurred,
stating they will make a recommendation based heavily on public input.
INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS
A. Letter from Mayor Hornaday, Re: Appointment of Bryan Zak as Planning Commission’s Representative on the Transportation Advisory Committee
B. Memorandum from City
Clerk, Re: Setting the Land Allocation Joint Worksession
with Council’s Advisory Bodies for
C. Resolution 06-160(A)
Establishing the 2007 Regular Meeting Schedule
D. Newspaper Article, Re:
More Open-Street Design is Not Wise
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
ADJOURNMENT
STARK/SMITH – MOVED TO ADJOURN.
There was no discussion.
VOTE: YES. NON OBJECTION. UNANIMOUS CONSENT.
Motion carried.
There being no further business to come before the Committee the
meeting adjourned at
_________________________________
JO JOHNSON, DEPUTY
Approved: ________________________