Session 06-03 a meeting of the Transportation Advisory Committee was called to order by Chair Marquardt at 5:37 p.m. on May 16, 2006 at the Homer City Hall Cowles Council Chambers located at 491 E. Pioneer Avenue, Homer, Alaska.

 

COMMITTEE MEMBERS:                      Mary Calhoun, Kurt Marquardt, Fred Pfeil, Steve Smith, Doug Stark

 

STAFF:                                                          Deputy City Clerk Johnson

                                                                        Public Works Director Meyer

 

AGENDA APPROVAL

 

SMITH/PFEIL – MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.

 

There was no discussion.

 

VOTE:  YES.  NON OBJECTION.  UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

 

Motion carried.

 

SYNOPSIS APPROVAL

 

            A.        April 11, 2006 Synopsis                                                                   

 

SMITH/PFEIL – MOVED TO APPROVE THE SYNOPSIS.

 

There was no discussion.

 

VOTE:  YES.  NON OBJECTION.  UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

 

Motion carried.

 

PENDING BUSINESS

 

None.

           

NEW BUSINESS

 

A.                Define Mission of Transportation Advisory Committee

 

Chair Marquardt said the discussion to change the name of the Road Standards Committee ensued eighteen months ago, as the committee’s work had expanded to include more than just road issues.  As all modes of transportation are integrated the name change to the Transportation Advisory Committee was chosen.  That suggestion may have come from Bill Smith.

 

Mr. Stark said it was important to include aviation in the committee’s tasks, as DOT is getting ready to implement the master plan following the hearings they have had in Homer.  Aircraft altitude and noise control measures were brought to the City Council, although the audience hooted it down and the resolution was not adopted. 

 

Mr. Smith has learned the State will take direction from the City for design consideration, if the City has a mechanism to voice concerns and spell out criteria.  That was apparent on the East End Road project when the public input was given on crosswalks and traffic lights.  It fits the committee’s mission to view all the transportation issues as they come up.  Mr. Smith said it was important to keep the TAC open to reviewing state and federal funded projects, as those agencies look to us for design criteria.

 

Mrs. Calhoun said there are two issues on the May 22, 2006 City Council meeting agenda that the City Manager wishes the TAC to address.  Those are the traffic calming/speed bump on Bunnell Avenue and the repaving projects.  The Council had requested that pedestrian pathways be included in the repaving projects, but due to costs the Manager has now broke that down a little.  There are issues with sidewalks, pedestrian pathways and corridors he wishes the committee to address at the next meeting following Council’s review of them at their upcoming meeting.

 

Mr. Stark said two years ago following the visit of Dan Burden, the walkability expert, the Council adopted a plan to repave six or seven roads.  There was a big discussion about width on the traffic lanes and pedestrian walkways.  As most of the roads have ditches on the side, it is expensive to go beyond the existing prism.  If the traffic lanes are reduced to 10 ft., and it is then striped, it would allow a four ft. walkway on one side.  The Council has been wrestling with it for a while and may have a final decision at the upcoming Council meeting.

 

Chair Marquardt noted that the committee discussed and forwarded their recommendations on the roads to the City Council a year ago.  He said the committee can discuss it again, although it is not on tonight’s agenda.

 

Mrs. Calhoun said she had brought up the pedestrian pathways due to the mission of the TAC, and at the City Manager’s suggestion.  Pedestrian issues will be forwarded to the TAC from the Council and will appear in the next TAC packet.  Mr. Stark asked if the committee’s previous work could be included in the upcoming City Council packet.[1]

 

When asked for his input on the roads, Public Works Director Carey Meyer said widening the road prism and impacting the ditches is a nice idea, but if it was possible it would have been done long ago.  At some point a commitment must be made to get rid of the ditches and go to a curb and gutter and sidewalk and a separated bike trail.  Storm drains cost a great deal.  Five years ago water quality was not an issue, but it is now.  Bartlett Street is a $600 per lineal ft. improvement with the drainage measures and Hohe Street required the overhead power lines to be moved.  It is a significant amount of money to place curb and gutters and sidewalk on one side of the street.  Currently the money is not available in the HARP (Homer Accelerated Roads Fund) fund.

 

Mr. Smith explained taking a 26 ft. wide street (13 ft. on each side of the center lane) shoulder that goes to a ditch and is paved out 11 ft., when moved over the crown must be realigned.  Now the 10 ft. lane is moved over next to the ditch and you are trying to squeeze a 10 ft. lane with a one-ft. wide stripe and 4 ft. pedestrian pathway.  In places it works fine and in places it is too skinny.

 

Mrs. Calhoun suggested the TAC’s work include the HARP program, as it is expiring in January 2008.  The program was adopted by the voters October 1987 and has been used for constructing roads since 1988.  There is a 20-year sunset and the sales tax collected to fund the program ceases then.  As a proponent for lowering taxes, Mr. Stark would like to see the ¾% tax currently being collected for HARP reduced to ¼% and the sales tax reduced by ½% without impacting the general revenues to the City.

 

Mr. Pfeil added the Homer Non Motorized Transportation and Trails Plan (HNMTTP) for pedestrian walkways, sidewalks and greenbelts to the Committee’s work.  Mr. Smith said assuring the motorized and non-motorized plans passed by the City Council are property implemented should be the TAC’s mission.

 

The Committee discussed their need to spend time with the issues before them, listen to public testimony and use their expertise to come up with a general agreement of recommendations to the City Council.  The mission should be to provide oversight of all transportation issues that come before the City and to make recommendations to the City Council when required.

 

Mrs. Calhoun suggested adding the Town Center Development Plan to the Committee’s work, as the Mayor will be creating a task force.  The City Manager has asked that boulevards within the Town Center be addressed at the next TAC meeting.  Mr. Stark said connecting Hazel Street through the Petro Marine property is needed to provide access from the east side of the Town Center.

 

The TAC discussed providing input on marine issues as needed, noting the Sterling Highway was the economic connection to the docks.  Mr. Smith reminded the Committee by Alaska Statute the DOT was created to expand the road system for the purpose of expanding the economy.  For the Committee to say they don’t want an economic expansion because it would increase traffic on the road is counteractive to what the DOT was asked to do.       

 

The Committee discussed the need to respect other Committees’ work, namely the port and harbor, trails and town center committees that have spent years on their goals.  The TAC needs to be familiar with the work done by others before launching into discussions, and not try to design.   

 

SMITH/PFEIL – MOVED TO ADOPT THE LANGUAGE OF THE MISSION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE:  WORKING COOPERATIVELY WITH OTHER BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, THE MISSION OF THE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE IS TO PROVIDE OVERSIGHT OF ALL TRANSPORTATION ISSUES THAT COME BEFORE THE CITY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COUNCIL.

 

Chair Marquardt said, “The TAC will be familiar with the work done by others.  In a weighted issue, members of the Committee working on the issue will be invited to join in the discussion.  The TAC should be familiar with the work done and not try to reinvent the wheel.”

 

Mrs. Calhoun requested the above statement by Chair Marquardt be made for the record.

 

VOTE:  YES.  NON OBJECTION.  UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

 

Motion carried.

 

            B.        Ordinance 2006 – Implementation of the Homer

                        Non-Motorized Transportation and Trails Plan 

 

CALHOUN/SMITH – MOVED TO ENDORSE THE DRAFT ORDINANCE.

 

Mr. Smith explained there was an attempt to take what was existing ordinance and update it to specifically address non motorized transportation issues.  He cautioned the TAC to pay close attention to the additions, stating wording may be included that was not intended.  He referenced historic trails at last month’s meeting, the fact of not forcing people to use them.  It is an example how there can be good intentions, yet an ordinance can have a life of its own.

 

Mrs. Calhoun noted her concern with the “shall” language rather than “may” in Section 8.  Public Works Director Meyer commented that subdividers respect the word “shall”, but not “may”.  Mr. Stark said the City is growing and in looking at the things we wish we had done better in previous years, at one point the City of Homer will need to bite the bullet and start doing things right.

 

Mrs. Calhoun said the City Manager related he and City Attorney Tans may have looked at the ordinance, but they have not reviewed it.

 

Section 1 of the site and access plan does not require people to build trails if there are not existing trails.  They just may not ignore existing trails.  If building in the CBD (Central Business District) provisions need to be made for the use of property to allow for pedestrians.  Mr. Smith asked who makes the final decision on a site plan?  Mr. Pfeil answered planning staff reviews the site and access plan for completeness, makes recommendations and then presents it to the Planning Commission.  The Committee noted the vagueness in Sections 1 and 2.

 

SMITH/PFEIL - MOVED TO PUT A CAUTIONARY NOTE IN APPROVAL OF THE WORDING OF TWO PARAGRAPHS IN SECTION 1 AND 2 AS THEY ARE POTENTIALLY VAGUE AND SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION BY THE CITY OR DEVELOPER.

 

Mr. Stark said although he doesn’t necessarily agree with it, he can live with it.

 

VOTE:  YES.  NON OBJECTION.  UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

 

Motion carried. 

 

VOTE:  (main motion) YES.  NON OBJECTION.  UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

 

Motion carried.        

 

INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS

 

            A.        Resolution 06-36(A) Restructuring the Road Standards

                        Committee    

                                                                                   

            B.        Appointments of Doug Stark and Mary Calhoun to the

                        Transportation Advisory Committee

                                                           

PUBLIC COMMENTS

 

Chair Marquardt said it was good to see Mr. Stark and Mrs. Calhoun as part of the TAC.  Next month’s agenda items will include discussions on traffic calming/speed bump issue on Bunnell Avenue, repaving/pedestrian issue of old HARP projects that are scheduled to be done and recommendation on the boulevard issue for the Town Center development plan.  Future discussions will include the HARP program. 

 

Mr. Stark would like to bring up the HARP program before the end of the year, particularly if we go to a seasonal sales tax.  It will be a good way to meld in, as when the sales tax goes up it could drop ½% on the HARP.  He said whatever the City Council does if there is a change from the present, it will need to be approved by the voters. 

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m.  The next regular meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 20, 2006 at 5:30 p.m. in Cowles Council Chambers.

 

____________________________________

JO JOHNSON, DEPUTY CITY CLERK

 

Approved: __________________________



[1] Synopsis of the Road Standards Committee of November 10, 2003 relating to HARP was included in the May 22, 2006 City Council packet.